Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Thomas Vanek Kevin Hayes

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerThomas Vanek: Goals, 0.25 a game, 75th percentileThomas Vanek: Assists, 0.46 a game, 87th percentileThomas Vanek: Points, 0.71 a game, 85th percentileThomas Vanek: Shots, 1.96 a game, 66th percentileThomas Vanek: Hits, 0.43 a game, 13th percentileThomas Vanek: Corsi for %, 47.4%, 22nd percentileThomas Vanek: CF% rel, -1.9, 28th percentileThomas Vanek: On-ice xG %, 47.2%, 25th percentileThomas Vanek: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 47th percentileThomas Vanek: Chances created, 0.90 xG per 60, 78th percentileThomas Vanek: Shot quality, 8.5% a shot, 76th percentileThomas Vanek: Finishing, +2.3 goals above expected, 74th percentileKevin Hayes: Goals, 0.22 a game, 69th percentileKevin Hayes: Assists, 0.42 a game, 84th percentileKevin Hayes: Points, 0.64 a game, 77th percentileKevin Hayes: Shots, 1.88 a game, 61st percentileKevin Hayes: Hits, 0.53 a game, 18th percentileKevin Hayes: Corsi for %, 43.3%, 4th percentileKevin Hayes: CF% rel, -6.1, 5th percentileKevin Hayes: On-ice xG %, 44.5%, 11th percentileKevin Hayes: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 17th percentileKevin Hayes: Chances created, 0.61 xG per 60, 27th percentileKevin Hayes: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 30th percentileKevin Hayes: Finishing, +3.1 goals above expected, 79th percentile
010203040204060Kevin Hayes 49Thomas Vanek 48

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Thomas Vanek
Kevin Hayes

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Thomas Vanek L, DET 2016-17 Kevin Hayes R, PIT
68 Games played 76
17 Goals 17
31 Assists 32
48 Points 49
0.71 Points per game 0.64
-5 Plus/minus 10
133 Shots 143
12.8 Shooting % 11.9
29 Hits 40
22 Penalty minutes 18
14:24 Average ice time 16:34
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.4 Corsi for % 43.3
-1.9 CF% relative to team -6.1
47.2 Fenwick for % 43.9
47.2 Expected goals for % 44.5
-1.9 xGF% relative to team -6.3
52.6 Goals for % 48.8
102.1 PDO 102.1
156 Shot attempts taken 189
Expected goals, all situations
14.7 Expected goals 12.9
0.90 Expected goals per 60 0.61
8.5% Chance per attempt 7.0%
+2.3 Goals above expected +3.1
Rating, in goals
+2.4 Goals above replacement -0.5
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.1
+5.4 Even-strength offence -0.7
-5.9 Even-strength defence -2.5
+0.6 Power play -1.0
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.4 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$2.6M Cap hit $2.6M
$54K Cap dollars per point $53K
$2.1M Worth at the going rate $244K
-$468K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean