Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Milan Michalek Sam Gagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMilan Michalek: Goals, 0.16 a game, 49th percentileMilan Michalek: Assists, 0.20 a game, 46th percentileMilan Michalek: Points, 0.36 a game, 45th percentileMilan Michalek: Shots, 1.42 a game, 40th percentileMilan Michalek: Hits, 0.93 a game, 39th percentileMilan Michalek: Corsi for %, 45.6%, 12th percentileMilan Michalek: CF% rel, -3.4, 15th percentileMilan Michalek: On-ice xG %, 47.7%, 31st percentileMilan Michalek: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 30th percentileMilan Michalek: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 55th percentileMilan Michalek: Shot quality, 9.8% a shot, 96th percentileMilan Michalek: Finishing, -2.0 goals above expected, 32nd percentileSam Gagner: Goals, 0.15 a game, 47th percentileSam Gagner: Assists, 0.15 a game, 34th percentileSam Gagner: Points, 0.30 a game, 40th percentileSam Gagner: Shots, 1.62 a game, 51st percentileSam Gagner: Hits, 0.32 a game, 6th percentileSam Gagner: Corsi for %, 51.6%, 67th percentileSam Gagner: CF% rel, 2.1, 67th percentileSam Gagner: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 33rd percentileSam Gagner: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 24th percentileSam Gagner: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 16th percentileSam Gagner: Shot quality, 5.2% a shot, 1st percentileSam Gagner: Finishing, +1.6 goals above expected, 71st percentile
0510152040Milan Michalek 16Sam Gagner 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Milan Michalek
Sam Gagner

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Milan Michalek L, TOR 2015-16 Sam Gagner C, EDM
45 Games played 53
7 Goals 8
9 Assists 8
16 Points 16
0.36 Points per game 0.30
0 Plus/minus 4
64 Shots 86
10.9 Shooting % 9.3
42 Hits 17
18 Penalty minutes 25
16:07 Average ice time 13:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.6 Corsi for % 51.6
-3.4 CF% relative to team +2.1
45.8 Fenwick for % 51.2
47.7 Expected goals for % 47.8
+0.7 xGF% relative to team +0.0
57.1 Goals for % 55.0
103.4 PDO 101.5
89 Shot attempts taken 135
Expected goals, all situations
9.0 Expected goals 6.4
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.52
9.8% Chance per attempt 5.2%
-2.0 Goals above expected +1.6
Rating, in goals
+0.7 Goals above replacement +0.0
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.0
-1.8 Even-strength offence -1.4
+1.7 Even-strength defence -0.1
-0.1 Power play -0.8
-0.6 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.4 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$4M Cap hit $4.8M
$250K Cap dollars per point $300K
$1M Worth at the going rate $582K
-$3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$4.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean