Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Brent Burns Neal Pionk

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrent Burns: Goals, 0.17 a game, 94th percentileBrent Burns: Assists, 0.47 a game, 91st percentileBrent Burns: Points, 0.64 a game, 92nd percentileBrent Burns: Shots, 3.21 a game, 98th percentileBrent Burns: Hits, 1.03 a game, 40th percentileBrent Burns: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 49th percentileBrent Burns: CF% rel, -1.2, 41st percentileBrent Burns: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 35th percentileBrent Burns: Rating, +5.6 goals above replacement, 83rd percentileBrent Burns: Chances created, 0.39 xG per 60, 96th percentileBrent Burns: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 76th percentileBrent Burns: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 62nd percentileNeal Pionk: Goals, 0.08 a game, 69th percentileNeal Pionk: Assists, 0.55 a game, 94th percentileNeal Pionk: Points, 0.63 a game, 92nd percentileNeal Pionk: Shots, 2.49 a game, 94th percentileNeal Pionk: Hits, 2.32 a game, 89th percentileNeal Pionk: Corsi for %, 51.5%, 69th percentileNeal Pionk: CF% rel, 4.4, 93rd percentileNeal Pionk: On-ice xG %, 46.9%, 29th percentileNeal Pionk: Rating, +5.4 goals above replacement, 82nd percentileNeal Pionk: Chances created, 0.27 xG per 60, 78th percentileNeal Pionk: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 51st percentileNeal Pionk: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 18th percentile
010203040204060Brent Burns 45Neal Pionk 45

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brent Burns
Neal Pionk

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brent Burns D, COL 2019-20 Neal Pionk D, WPG
70 Games played 71
12 Goals 6
33 Assists 39
45 Points 45
0.64 Points per game 0.63
-22 Plus/minus 10
225 Shots 177
5.3 Shooting % 3.4
72 Hits 165
34 Penalty minutes 32
25:25 Average ice time 23:23
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.6 Corsi for % 51.5
-1.2 CF% relative to team +4.4
48.8 Fenwick for % 50.3
47.8 Expected goals for % 46.9
-1.0 xGF% relative to team +4.6
44.9 Goals for % 50.0
98.9 PDO 99.8
375 Shot attempts taken 240
Expected goals, all situations
11.6 Expected goals 7.5
0.39 Expected goals per 60 0.27
3.6% Chance per attempt 3.1%
+0.4 Goals above expected -1.5
Rating, in goals
+5.6 Goals above replacement +5.4
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.9
+3.0 Even-strength offence +1.7
-3.4 Even-strength defence -1.1
+1.2 Power play +0.7
+0.4 Penalty kill -0.8
-1.5 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$8M Cap hit $3M
$178K Cap dollars per point $67K
$5.3M Worth at the going rate $5.2M
-$2.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean