Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2025-26 season

At a glance

Brent Burns Luke Hughes

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrent Burns: Goals, 0.15 a game, 88th percentileBrent Burns: Assists, 0.28 a game, 67th percentileBrent Burns: Points, 0.43 a game, 76th percentileBrent Burns: Shots, 2.10 a game, 91st percentileBrent Burns: Hits, 0.24 a game, 6th percentileBrent Burns: Corsi for %, 55.6%, 93rd percentileBrent Burns: CF% rel, -1.2, 38th percentileBrent Burns: On-ice xG %, 56.2%, 90th percentileBrent Burns: Rating, +5.7 goals above replacement, 80th percentileBrent Burns: Chances created, 0.25 xG per 60, 70th percentileBrent Burns: Shot quality, 2.5% a shot, 12th percentileBrent Burns: Finishing, +5.4 goals above expected, 95th percentileLuke Hughes: Goals, 0.09 a game, 70th percentileLuke Hughes: Assists, 0.43 a game, 88th percentileLuke Hughes: Points, 0.51 a game, 87th percentileLuke Hughes: Shots, 2.21 a game, 93rd percentileLuke Hughes: Hits, 0.28 a game, 8th percentileLuke Hughes: Corsi for %, 53.5%, 84th percentileLuke Hughes: CF% rel, 3.3, 85th percentileLuke Hughes: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 52nd percentileLuke Hughes: Rating, +3.5 goals above replacement, 65th percentileLuke Hughes: Chances created, 0.34 xG per 60, 90th percentileLuke Hughes: Shot quality, 4.2% a shot, 79th percentileLuke Hughes: Finishing, -2.9 goals above expected, 8th percentile
010203020406080Brent Burns 35Luke Hughes 35

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brent Burns
Luke Hughes

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brent Burns D, COL 2025-26 Luke Hughes D, NJD
82 Games played 68
12 Goals 6
23 Assists 29
35 Points 35
0.43 Points per game 0.51
33 Plus/minus -4
172 Shots 150
7.0 Shooting % 4.0
20 Hits 19
32 Penalty minutes 32
18:53 Average ice time 23:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.6 Corsi for % 53.5
-1.2 CF% relative to team +3.3
55.1 Fenwick for % 52.8
56.2 Expected goals for % 49.8
-2.1 xGF% relative to team +1.1
62.2 Goals for % 46.9
102.0 PDO 98.2
365 Shot attempts taken 289
Expected goals, all situations
6.6 Expected goals 8.9
0.25 Expected goals per 60 0.34
2.5% Chance per attempt 4.2%
+5.4 Goals above expected -2.9
Rating, in goals
+5.7 Goals above replacement +3.5
+1.0 Wins above replacement +0.6
+3.6 Even-strength offence +1.6
-1.7 Even-strength defence -2.5
-1.0 Power play +0.2
+0.8 Penalty kill -0.2
-1.0 Penalties -0.7
Contract
$1M Cap hit $9M
$29K Cap dollars per point $257K
$5.6M Worth at the going rate $3.8M
+$4.6M Value: worth minus cap hit -$5.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean