Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Brian Boyle James Wright

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrian Boyle: Goals, 0.05 a game, 12th percentileBrian Boyle: Assists, 0.08 a game, 14th percentileBrian Boyle: Points, 0.13 a game, 11th percentileBrian Boyle: Shots, 1.47 a game, 43rd percentileBrian Boyle: Hits, 3.82 a game, 99th percentileBrian Boyle: Corsi for %, 50.1%, 53rd percentileBrian Boyle: CF% rel, -3.1, 22nd percentileBrian Boyle: On-ice xG %, 47.9%, 35th percentileBrian Boyle: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 7th percentileBrian Boyle: Chances created, 0.58 xG per 60, 28th percentileBrian Boyle: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 17th percentileBrian Boyle: Finishing, -4.3 goals above expected, 6th percentileJames Wright: Goals, 0.05 a game, 12th percentileJames Wright: Assists, 0.08 a game, 14th percentileJames Wright: Points, 0.13 a game, 11th percentileJames Wright: Shots, 0.84 a game, 11th percentileJames Wright: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileJames Wright: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 12th percentileJames Wright: CF% rel, -5.8, 10th percentileJames Wright: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 12th percentileJames Wright: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 26th percentileJames Wright: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 4th percentileJames Wright: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 19th percentileJames Wright: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 42nd percentile
01234520Brian Boyle 5James Wright 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brian Boyle
James Wright

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brian Boyle C, PIT 2012-13 James Wright C, WPG
38 Games played 38
2 Goals 2
3 Assists 3
5 Points 5
0.13 Points per game 0.13
-13 Plus/minus -5
56 Shots 32
3.6 Shooting % 6.3
145 Hits 43
29 Penalty minutes 31
14:13 Average ice time 11:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.1 Corsi for % 44.7
-3.1 CF% relative to team -5.8
51.9 Fenwick for % 45.6
47.9 Expected goals for % 44.0
-5.1 xGF% relative to team -7.2
22.7 Goals for % 40.0
94.1 PDO 98.3
90 Shot attempts taken 52
Expected goals, all situations
5.3 Expected goals 2.7
0.58 Expected goals per 60 0.37
6.3% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-4.3 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
-1.6 Goals above replacement +0.3
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.0
-3.2 Even-strength offence -2.7
+0.8 Even-strength defence +0.2
+0.1 Power play +0.0
-0.6 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.2 Penalties +1.4
Contract
$1.7M Cap hit $650K
$340K Cap dollars per point $130K
-$873K Worth at the going rate $749K
-$2.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$99K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean