Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Loui Eriksson Sam Gagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLoui Eriksson: Goals, 0.12 a game, 31st percentileLoui Eriksson: Assists, 0.14 a game, 22nd percentileLoui Eriksson: Points, 0.27 a game, 24th percentileLoui Eriksson: Shots, 1.20 a game, 23rd percentileLoui Eriksson: Hits, 0.20 a game, 3rd percentileLoui Eriksson: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 40th percentileLoui Eriksson: CF% rel, 1.3, 59th percentileLoui Eriksson: On-ice xG %, 49.5%, 41st percentileLoui Eriksson: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 14th percentileLoui Eriksson: Chances created, 0.56 xG per 60, 14th percentileLoui Eriksson: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 55th percentileLoui Eriksson: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 33rd percentileSam Gagner: Goals, 0.14 a game, 39th percentileSam Gagner: Assists, 0.17 a game, 29th percentileSam Gagner: Points, 0.31 a game, 31st percentileSam Gagner: Shots, 1.88 a game, 61st percentileSam Gagner: Hits, 0.52 a game, 21st percentileSam Gagner: Corsi for %, 51.3%, 60th percentileSam Gagner: CF% rel, 3.3, 79th percentileSam Gagner: On-ice xG %, 51.4%, 60th percentileSam Gagner: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 31st percentileSam Gagner: Chances created, 0.80 xG per 60, 54th percentileSam Gagner: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 11th percentileSam Gagner: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 36th percentile
05102040Loui Eriksson 13Sam Gagner 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Loui Eriksson
Sam Gagner

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Loui Eriksson L, ARI 2019-20 Sam Gagner C, EDM
49 Games played 42
6 Goals 6
7 Assists 7
13 Points 13
0.27 Points per game 0.31
-2 Plus/minus -10
59 Shots 79
10.2 Shooting % 7.6
10 Hits 22
12 Penalty minutes 12
12:22 Average ice time 13:21
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.6 Corsi for % 51.3
+1.3 CF% relative to team +3.3
48.6 Fenwick for % 52.3
49.5 Expected goals for % 51.4
+0.4 xGF% relative to team +4.0
40.9 Goals for % 39.0
97.5 PDO 95.3
76 Shot attempts taken 115
Expected goals, all situations
5.7 Expected goals 7.5
0.56 Expected goals per 60 0.80
8.2% Chance per attempt 6.9%
-1.7 Goals above expected -1.5
Rating, in goals
-0.8 Goals above replacement +0.9
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.2
-1.8 Even-strength offence +0.1
+0.1 Even-strength defence -0.5
0.0 Power play +0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.4
-0.8 Penalties 0.0
Contract
$6M Cap hit $3.15M
$462K Cap dollars per point $242K
$38K Worth at the going rate $1.4M
-$6M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.7M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean