Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Corey Crawford Connor Hellebuyck

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCorey Crawford: Save %, 0.918, 67th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals against, 2.51 a game, 35th percentileCorey Crawford: Workload, 30.7 shots a game, 82nd percentileCorey Crawford: Games, 55 games, 64th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals saved, +0.09 above expected per 60, 58th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Save %, 0.907, 16th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals against, 2.61 a game, 20th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Workload, 28.1 shots a game, 45th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Games, 56 games, 67th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals saved, -0.29 above expected per 60, 11th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Corey Crawford G, CHI 2016-17 Connor Hellebuyck G, WPG
55 Games played 56
32 Wins 26
18 Losses 19
2 Shutouts 4
1,691 Shots against 1,572
1,553 Saves 1,426
138 Goals against 146
0.918 Save % 0.907
2.55 Goals against average 2.89
Expected goals, while he was in net
143.1 Expected goals against 131.2
+5.1 Goals saved above expected -14.8
+0.09 Saved above expected per 60 -0.29
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.1%
Rating, in goals
+19.6 Goals above replacement -1.5
+3.3 Wins above replacement -0.2
Contract
$6M Cap hit $668K
$4.8M Worth at the going rate $255K
-$1.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$413K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean