Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Daniel Carcillo Eric Belanger

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDaniel Carcillo: Goals, 0.09 a game, 27th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Assists, 0.04 a game, 7th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Points, 0.13 a game, 10th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Shots, 1.00 a game, 16th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Hits, 1.61 a game, 69th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Corsi for %, 54.7%, 86th percentileDaniel Carcillo: CF% rel, -1.0, 41st percentileDaniel Carcillo: On-ice xG %, 52.7%, 73rd percentileDaniel Carcillo: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 31st percentileDaniel Carcillo: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 31st percentileDaniel Carcillo: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 53rd percentileDaniel Carcillo: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 52nd percentileEric Belanger: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileEric Belanger: Assists, 0.12 a game, 23rd percentileEric Belanger: Points, 0.12 a game, 9th percentileEric Belanger: Shots, 1.19 a game, 27th percentileEric Belanger: Hits, 0.73 a game, 29th percentileEric Belanger: Corsi for %, 37.7%, 1st percentileEric Belanger: CF% rel, -9.2, 2nd percentileEric Belanger: On-ice xG %, 32.2%, 1st percentileEric Belanger: Rating, -2.5 goals above replacement, 2nd percentileEric Belanger: Chances created, 0.30 xG per 60, 1st percentileEric Belanger: Shot quality, 5.3% a shot, 3rd percentileEric Belanger: Finishing, -1.8 goals above expected, 25th percentile
012320Daniel Carcillo 3Eric Belanger 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Daniel Carcillo
Eric Belanger

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Daniel Carcillo L, CHI 2012-13 Eric Belanger C, EDM
23 Games played 26
2 Goals 0
1 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.13 Points per game 0.12
1 Plus/minus -1
23 Shots 31
8.7 Shooting % 0.0
37 Hits 19
11 Penalty minutes 10
9:00 Average ice time 14:07
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.7 Corsi for % 37.7
-1.0 CF% relative to team -9.2
54.6 Fenwick for % 37.3
52.7 Expected goals for % 32.2
0.0 xGF% relative to team -12.0
52.9 Goals for % 38.5
98.4 PDO 100.3
42 Shot attempts taken 43
Expected goals, all situations
2.0 Expected goals 1.8
0.59 Expected goals per 60 0.30
7.6% Chance per attempt 5.3%
0.0 Goals above expected -1.8
Rating, in goals
+0.5 Goals above replacement -2.5
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.4
-0.5 Even-strength offence -2.0
+0.3 Even-strength defence -0.6
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.6
+0.2 Penalties -0.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean