Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

John Mitchell David Moss

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn Mitchell: Goals, 0.21 a game, 64th percentileJohn Mitchell: Assists, 0.21 a game, 50th percentileJohn Mitchell: Points, 0.43 a game, 55th percentileJohn Mitchell: Shots, 1.53 a game, 46th percentileJohn Mitchell: Hits, 2.11 a game, 84th percentileJohn Mitchell: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 52nd percentileJohn Mitchell: CF% rel, 1.9, 68th percentileJohn Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 46.5%, 27th percentileJohn Mitchell: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 62nd percentileJohn Mitchell: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 12th percentileJohn Mitchell: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 18th percentileJohn Mitchell: Finishing, +3.7 goals above expected, 88th percentileDavid Moss: Goals, 0.11 a game, 34th percentileDavid Moss: Assists, 0.33 a game, 71st percentileDavid Moss: Points, 0.44 a game, 57th percentileDavid Moss: Shots, 1.82 a game, 58th percentileDavid Moss: Hits, 1.62 a game, 70th percentileDavid Moss: Corsi for %, 52.4%, 73rd percentileDavid Moss: CF% rel, 2.7, 76th percentileDavid Moss: On-ice xG %, 55.6%, 84th percentileDavid Moss: Rating, +7.6 goals above replacement, 91st percentileDavid Moss: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 58th percentileDavid Moss: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 54th percentileDavid Moss: Finishing, -4.7 goals above expected, 3rd percentile
051015202040John Mitchell 20David Moss 20

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John Mitchell
David Moss

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John Mitchell C, COL 2012-13 David Moss R, ARI
47 Games played 45
10 Goals 5
10 Assists 15
20 Points 20
0.43 Points per game 0.44
5 Plus/minus 3
72 Shots 82
13.9 Shooting % 6.1
99 Hits 73
18 Penalty minutes 21
16:45 Average ice time 15:33
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.0 Corsi for % 52.4
+1.9 CF% relative to team +2.7
49.9 Fenwick for % 53.5
46.5 Expected goals for % 55.6
-0.7 xGF% relative to team +8.4
54.1 Goals for % 55.0
100.8 PDO 100.5
119 Shot attempts taken 136
Expected goals, all situations
6.3 Expected goals 8.7
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.74
6.3% Chance per attempt 7.6%
+3.7 Goals above expected -4.7
Rating, in goals
+2.6 Goals above replacement +7.6
+0.4 Wins above replacement +1.3
-1.4 Even-strength offence +2.8
+2.1 Even-strength defence +2.0
-0.5 Power play +0.1
-0.4 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.6 Penalties +1.1
Contract
$1.1M Cap hit $2.1M
$55K Cap dollars per point $105K
$2.8M Worth at the going rate $7.1M
+$1.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean