Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Brad Richardson Daniel Carr

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrad Richardson: Goals, 0.31 a game, 87th percentileBrad Richardson: Assists, 0.25 a game, 59th percentileBrad Richardson: Points, 0.56 a game, 70th percentileBrad Richardson: Shots, 1.56 a game, 46th percentileBrad Richardson: Hits, 1.19 a game, 61st percentileBrad Richardson: Corsi for %, 44.0%, 5th percentileBrad Richardson: CF% rel, -2.1, 26th percentileBrad Richardson: On-ice xG %, 36.2%, 1st percentileBrad Richardson: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileBrad Richardson: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 25th percentileBrad Richardson: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 51st percentileBrad Richardson: Finishing, +2.5 goals above expected, 75th percentileDaniel Carr: Goals, 0.06 a game, 11th percentileDaniel Carr: Assists, 0.21 a game, 47th percentileDaniel Carr: Points, 0.27 a game, 30th percentileDaniel Carr: Shots, 1.33 a game, 32nd percentileDaniel Carr: Hits, 0.58 a game, 22nd percentileDaniel Carr: Corsi for %, 50.9%, 59th percentileDaniel Carr: CF% rel, -5.1, 8th percentileDaniel Carr: On-ice xG %, 56.0%, 92nd percentileDaniel Carr: Rating, +3.0 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileDaniel Carr: Chances created, 0.98 xG per 60, 87th percentileDaniel Carr: Shot quality, 8.7% a shot, 81st percentileDaniel Carr: Finishing, -3.5 goals above expected, 17th percentile
0246820Brad Richardson 9Daniel Carr 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brad Richardson
Daniel Carr

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brad Richardson R, VAN 2016-17 Daniel Carr L, WSH
16 Games played 33
5 Goals 2
4 Assists 7
9 Points 9
0.56 Points per game 0.27
-1 Plus/minus 4
25 Shots 44
20.0 Shooting % 4.5
19 Hits 19
15 Penalty minutes 6
15:21 Average ice time 10:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.0 Corsi for % 50.9
-2.1 CF% relative to team -5.1
42.0 Fenwick for % 53.6
36.2 Expected goals for % 56.0
-4.8 xGF% relative to team +0.6
40.0 Goals for % 59.1
99.1 PDO 102.0
34 Shot attempts taken 73
Expected goals, all situations
2.5 Expected goals 5.5
0.60 Expected goals per 60 0.98
7.7% Chance per attempt 8.7%
+2.5 Goals above expected -3.5
Rating, in goals
-0.2 Goals above replacement +3.0
0.0 Wins above replacement +0.5
-1.0 Even-strength offence +0.6
+0.5 Even-strength defence +1.0
-0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.3 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$2.083M Cap hit $725K
$231K Cap dollars per point $81K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean