Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Marc Methot Brandon Manning

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMarc Methot: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMarc Methot: Assists, 0.18 a game, 42nd percentileMarc Methot: Points, 0.18 a game, 25th percentileMarc Methot: Shots, 1.01 a game, 27th percentileMarc Methot: Hits, 2.41 a game, 92nd percentileMarc Methot: Corsi for %, 47.5%, 23rd percentileMarc Methot: CF% rel, -1.3, 34th percentileMarc Methot: On-ice xG %, 50.3%, 53rd percentileMarc Methot: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 59th percentileMarc Methot: Chances created, 0.12 xG per 60, 20th percentileMarc Methot: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 71st percentileMarc Methot: Finishing, -2.8 goals above expected, 7th percentileBrandon Manning: Goals, 0.05 a game, 42nd percentileBrandon Manning: Assists, 0.14 a game, 28th percentileBrandon Manning: Points, 0.18 a game, 30th percentileBrandon Manning: Shots, 1.29 a game, 53rd percentileBrandon Manning: Hits, 1.86 a game, 78th percentileBrandon Manning: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 75th percentileBrandon Manning: CF% rel, 1.1, 67th percentileBrandon Manning: On-ice xG %, 46.9%, 23rd percentileBrandon Manning: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 27th percentileBrandon Manning: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 43rd percentileBrandon Manning: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 41st percentileBrandon Manning: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 24th percentile
0510204060Marc Methot 12Brandon Manning 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Marc Methot
Brandon Manning

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Marc Methot D, DAL 2016-17 Brandon Manning D, EDM
68 Games played 65
0 Goals 3
12 Assists 9
12 Points 12
0.18 Points per game 0.18
13 Plus/minus -12
69 Shots 84
0.0 Shooting % 3.6
164 Hits 121
24 Penalty minutes 83
19:49 Average ice time 18:03
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.5 Corsi for % 51.7
-1.3 CF% relative to team +1.1
48.5 Fenwick for % 50.7
50.3 Expected goals for % 46.9
+1.9 xGF% relative to team -3.1
54.0 Goals for % 41.3
101.1 PDO 97.5
106 Shot attempts taken 181
Expected goals, all situations
2.8 Expected goals 3.4
0.12 Expected goals per 60 0.17
3.5% Chance per attempt 2.9%
-2.8 Goals above expected -1.4
Rating, in goals
+2.6 Goals above replacement -0.4
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.1
-1.3 Even-strength offence -1.4
-0.6 Even-strength defence -2.9
-0.1 Power play -0.2
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.7
-0.2 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$4.9M Cap hit $975K
$408K Cap dollars per point $81K
$2.2M Worth at the going rate $302K
-$2.7M Value: worth minus cap hit -$673K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean