Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Max Talbot

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.23 a game, 24th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.09 a game, 17th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.55 a game, 90th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.2, 13th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 16th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 44th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -3.9 goals above expected, 13th percentileMax Talbot: Goals, 0.06 a game, 13th percentileMax Talbot: Assists, 0.16 a game, 32nd percentileMax Talbot: Points, 0.22 a game, 23rd percentileMax Talbot: Shots, 1.20 a game, 26th percentileMax Talbot: Hits, 1.63 a game, 67th percentileMax Talbot: Corsi for %, 44.2%, 12th percentileMax Talbot: CF% rel, -1.6, 28th percentileMax Talbot: On-ice xG %, 44.3%, 15th percentileMax Talbot: Rating, +3.9 goals above replacement, 56th percentileMax Talbot: Chances created, 0.42 xG per 60, 7th percentileMax Talbot: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 24th percentileMax Talbot: Finishing, -2.7 goals above expected, 24th percentile
05101520406080Nate Thompson 18Max Talbot 18

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Max Talbot

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2014-15 Max Talbot C, BOS
80 Games played 81
5 Goals 5
13 Assists 13
18 Points 18
0.23 Points per game 0.22
0 Plus/minus -1
87 Shots 97
5.7 Shooting % 5.2
204 Hits 132
39 Penalty minutes 29
13:19 Average ice time 13:37
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.1 Corsi for % 44.2
-4.2 CF% relative to team -1.6
48.3 Fenwick for % 45.8
47.8 Expected goals for % 44.3
-5.0 xGF% relative to team +1.6
47.2 Goals for % 47.8
100.1 PDO 99.7
132 Shot attempts taken 136
Expected goals, all situations
8.9 Expected goals 7.7
0.50 Expected goals per 60 0.42
7.3% Chance per attempt 6.6%
-3.9 Goals above expected -2.7
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement +3.9
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.6
-3.6 Even-strength offence -2.1
+1.6 Even-strength defence +3.5
-0.2 Power play -0.3
-0.2 Penalty kill -1.6
+0.5 Penalties +1.4
Contract
$1.6M Cap hit $1.8M
$89K Cap dollars per point $100K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate $2.9M
-$427K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean