Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Daniel Paille

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.13 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.09 a game, 19th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.22 a game, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.25 a game, 30th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.57 a game, 74th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 9th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.6, 12th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +2.7 goals above replacement, 50th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 12th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 56th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 58th percentileDaniel Paille: Goals, 0.13 a game, 42nd percentileDaniel Paille: Assists, 0.09 a game, 17th percentileDaniel Paille: Points, 0.22 a game, 27th percentileDaniel Paille: Shots, 1.25 a game, 29th percentileDaniel Paille: Hits, 0.86 a game, 38th percentileDaniel Paille: Corsi for %, 46.0%, 15th percentileDaniel Paille: CF% rel, -8.9, 2nd percentileDaniel Paille: On-ice xG %, 47.6%, 29th percentileDaniel Paille: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 28th percentileDaniel Paille: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 22nd percentileDaniel Paille: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 21st percentileDaniel Paille: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 66th percentile
051015204060Nate Thompson 15Daniel Paille 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Daniel Paille

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2011-12 Daniel Paille L, NYR
68 Games played 69
9 Goals 9
6 Assists 6
15 Points 15
0.22 Points per game 0.22
-23 Plus/minus -5
85 Shots 86
10.6 Shooting % 10.5
107 Hits 59
21 Penalty minutes 15
14:49 Average ice time 11:30
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.7 Corsi for % 46.0
-4.6 CF% relative to team -8.9
46.0 Fenwick for % 47.2
47.4 Expected goals for % 47.6
-1.5 xGF% relative to team -6.7
31.1 Goals for % 42.6
93.9 PDO 99.2
121 Shot attempts taken 123
Expected goals, all situations
8.1 Expected goals 7.3
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.55
7.6% Chance per attempt 6.4%
+0.9 Goals above expected +1.7
Rating, in goals
+2.7 Goals above replacement +0.5
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.1
-3.7 Even-strength offence -2.2
+3.4 Even-strength defence -0.9
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.5 Penalties +0.9
Contract
$900K Cap hit $1.075M
$60K Cap dollars per point $72K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate $715K
+$815K Value: worth minus cap hit -$360K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean