Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Steve Bernier

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.16 a game, 48th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.18 a game, 41st percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.33 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.29 a game, 34th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.89 a game, 78th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 44.1%, 11th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -3.7, 20th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 44.5%, 15th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 39th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 18th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 73rd percentileSteve Bernier: Goals, 0.17 a game, 53rd percentileSteve Bernier: Assists, 0.15 a game, 33rd percentileSteve Bernier: Points, 0.32 a game, 42nd percentileSteve Bernier: Shots, 1.87 a game, 61st percentileSteve Bernier: Hits, 1.36 a game, 60th percentileSteve Bernier: Corsi for %, 54.2%, 83rd percentileSteve Bernier: CF% rel, -2.0, 31st percentileSteve Bernier: On-ice xG %, 59.1%, 95th percentileSteve Bernier: Rating, +3.6 goals above replacement, 71st percentileSteve Bernier: Chances created, 1.00 xG per 60, 90th percentileSteve Bernier: Shot quality, 9.5% a shot, 96th percentileSteve Bernier: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 8th percentile
0510152040Nate Thompson 15Steve Bernier 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Steve Bernier

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2012-13 Steve Bernier R, NYI
45 Games played 47
7 Goals 8
8 Assists 7
15 Points 15
0.33 Points per game 0.32
-2 Plus/minus -7
58 Shots 88
12.1 Shooting % 9.1
85 Hits 64
17 Penalty minutes 17
14:20 Average ice time 13:46
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.1 Corsi for % 54.2
-3.7 CF% relative to team -2.0
45.5 Fenwick for % 54.9
44.5 Expected goals for % 59.1
-4.4 xGF% relative to team +3.0
47.2 Goals for % 43.8
100.2 PDO 96.9
97 Shot attempts taken 106
Expected goals, all situations
5.3 Expected goals 10.8
0.50 Expected goals per 60 1.00
6.4% Chance per attempt 9.5%
+1.7 Goals above expected -3.8
Rating, in goals
+1.1 Goals above replacement +3.6
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.6
-0.2 Even-strength offence +0.3
+0.2 Even-strength defence +0.6
-0.1 Power play -0.3
-0.7 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.1 Penalties +1.3
Contract
$900K Cap hit $775K
$60K Cap dollars per point $52K
$1.4M Worth at the going rate $3.7M
+$549K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean