Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Tom Wandell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.13 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.09 a game, 19th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.22 a game, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.25 a game, 30th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.57 a game, 74th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 9th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.6, 12th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +2.7 goals above replacement, 50th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 12th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 56th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 58th percentileTom Wandell: Goals, 0.08 a game, 27th percentileTom Wandell: Assists, 0.13 a game, 28th percentileTom Wandell: Points, 0.21 a game, 25th percentileTom Wandell: Shots, 1.43 a game, 40th percentileTom Wandell: Hits, 0.72 a game, 28th percentileTom Wandell: Corsi for %, 54.3%, 85th percentileTom Wandell: CF% rel, 4.7, 86th percentileTom Wandell: On-ice xG %, 54.8%, 86th percentileTom Wandell: Rating, +5.1 goals above replacement, 69th percentileTom Wandell: Chances created, 0.61 xG per 60, 30th percentileTom Wandell: Shot quality, 5.1% a shot, 1st percentileTom Wandell: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
051015204060Nate Thompson 15Tom Wandell 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Tom Wandell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2011-12 Tom Wandell C, DAL
68 Games played 72
9 Goals 6
6 Assists 9
15 Points 15
0.22 Points per game 0.21
-23 Plus/minus -5
85 Shots 103
10.6 Shooting % 5.8
107 Hits 52
21 Penalty minutes 16
14:49 Average ice time 9:44
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.7 Corsi for % 54.3
-4.6 CF% relative to team +4.7
46.0 Fenwick for % 54.9
47.4 Expected goals for % 54.8
-1.5 xGF% relative to team +7.0
31.1 Goals for % 38.9
93.9 PDO 96.0
121 Shot attempts taken 172
Expected goals, all situations
8.1 Expected goals 7.1
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.61
7.6% Chance per attempt 5.1%
+0.9 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+2.7 Goals above replacement +5.1
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.8
-3.7 Even-strength offence -0.7
+3.4 Even-strength defence +4.9
-0.1 Power play -0.5
-0.2 Penalty kill -0.6
+0.5 Penalties +0.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean