Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Matt Beleskey

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.13 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.09 a game, 19th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.22 a game, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.25 a game, 30th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.57 a game, 74th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 9th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.6, 12th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +2.7 goals above replacement, 50th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 12th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 56th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 58th percentileMatt Beleskey: Goals, 0.06 a game, 17th percentileMatt Beleskey: Assists, 0.16 a game, 36th percentileMatt Beleskey: Points, 0.21 a game, 26th percentileMatt Beleskey: Shots, 1.07 a game, 22nd percentileMatt Beleskey: Hits, 1.49 a game, 69th percentileMatt Beleskey: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 16th percentileMatt Beleskey: CF% rel, -2.7, 23rd percentileMatt Beleskey: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 7th percentileMatt Beleskey: Rating, -1.5 goals above replacement, 10th percentileMatt Beleskey: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 18th percentileMatt Beleskey: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 6th percentileMatt Beleskey: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 30th percentile
051015204060Nate Thompson 15Matt Beleskey 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Matt Beleskey

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2011-12 Matt Beleskey L, NYR
68 Games played 70
9 Goals 4
6 Assists 11
15 Points 15
0.22 Points per game 0.21
-23 Plus/minus -2
85 Shots 75
10.6 Shooting % 5.3
107 Hits 104
21 Penalty minutes 72
14:49 Average ice time 10:16
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.7 Corsi for % 46.3
-4.6 CF% relative to team -2.7
46.0 Fenwick for % 46.0
47.4 Expected goals for % 44.0
-1.5 xGF% relative to team -4.9
31.1 Goals for % 48.0
93.9 PDO 100.8
121 Shot attempts taken 153
Expected goals, all situations
8.1 Expected goals 6.3
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.52
7.6% Chance per attempt 5.7%
+0.9 Goals above expected -2.3
Rating, in goals
+2.7 Goals above replacement -1.5
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.3
-3.7 Even-strength offence -2.3
+3.4 Even-strength defence -1.1
-0.1 Power play 0.0
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.5 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$900K Cap hit $738K
$60K Cap dollars per point $49K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate -$193K
+$815K Value: worth minus cap hit -$931K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean