Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Tommy Wingels

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.07 a game, 10th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.17 a game, 35th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.25 a game, 22nd percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.77 a game, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.77 a game, 82nd percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 43.5%, 3rd percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -6.0, 4th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 39.9%, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.27 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 5.2% a shot, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 43rd percentileTommy Wingels: Goals, 0.12 a game, 28th percentileTommy Wingels: Assists, 0.11 a game, 13th percentileTommy Wingels: Points, 0.23 a game, 18th percentileTommy Wingels: Shots, 1.15 a game, 20th percentileTommy Wingels: Hits, 2.39 a game, 93rd percentileTommy Wingels: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 33rd percentileTommy Wingels: CF% rel, -6.1, 3rd percentileTommy Wingels: On-ice xG %, 52.5%, 71st percentileTommy Wingels: Rating, +3.0 goals above replacement, 54th percentileTommy Wingels: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 23rd percentileTommy Wingels: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 29th percentileTommy Wingels: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 46th percentile
051015204060Nate Thompson 17Tommy Wingels 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Tommy Wingels

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2017-18 Tommy Wingels C, BOS
69 Games played 75
5 Goals 9
12 Assists 8
17 Points 17
0.25 Points per game 0.23
-1 Plus/minus -11
53 Shots 86
9.4 Shooting % 10.5
122 Hits 179
20 Penalty minutes 45
12:46 Average ice time 11:29
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.5 Corsi for % 48.7
-6.0 CF% relative to team -6.1
45.4 Fenwick for % 49.4
39.9 Expected goals for % 52.5
-7.7 xGF% relative to team +1.0
44.4 Goals for % 36.8
99.5 PDO 95.8
94 Shot attempts taken 131
Expected goals, all situations
4.0 Expected goals 8.7
0.27 Expected goals per 60 0.60
5.2% Chance per attempt 6.9%
-1.0 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
-1.7 Goals above replacement +3.0
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.5
-4.4 Even-strength offence -2.7
+1.2 Even-strength defence +2.8
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.7 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$1.65M Cap hit $750K
$97K Cap dollars per point $44K
-$444K Worth at the going rate $2.5M
-$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean