Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Calle Jarnkrok

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.23 a game, 24th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.09 a game, 17th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.55 a game, 90th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.2, 13th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 16th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 44th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -3.9 goals above expected, 13th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Goals, 0.09 a game, 23rd percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Assists, 0.15 a game, 29th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Points, 0.24 a game, 26th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Shots, 1.28 a game, 30th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Hits, 0.43 a game, 10th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Corsi for %, 53.9%, 79th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: CF% rel, 1.8, 67th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: On-ice xG %, 58.0%, 96th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Rating, +5.2 goals above replacement, 66th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 31st percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 40th percentileCalle Jarnkrok: Finishing, -2.5 goals above expected, 28th percentile
05101520406080Nate Thompson 18Calle Jarnkrok 18

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Calle Jarnkrok

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2014-15 Calle Jarnkrok C, TOR
80 Games played 74
5 Goals 7
13 Assists 11
18 Points 18
0.23 Points per game 0.24
0 Plus/minus 2
87 Shots 95
5.7 Shooting % 7.4
204 Hits 32
39 Penalty minutes 18
13:19 Average ice time 12:51
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.1 Corsi for % 53.9
-4.2 CF% relative to team +1.8
48.3 Fenwick for % 55.2
47.8 Expected goals for % 58.0
-5.0 xGF% relative to team +4.7
47.2 Goals for % 51.9
100.1 PDO 99.1
132 Shot attempts taken 171
Expected goals, all situations
8.9 Expected goals 9.5
0.50 Expected goals per 60 0.60
7.3% Chance per attempt 7.1%
-3.9 Goals above expected -2.5
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement +5.2
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.9
-3.6 Even-strength offence -0.2
+1.6 Even-strength defence +1.4
-0.2 Power play -0.2
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.5 Penalties +1.3
Contract
$1.6M Cap hit $715K
$89K Cap dollars per point $40K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate $3.7M
-$427K Value: worth minus cap hit +$3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean