Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Chris Wagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 13th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.06 a game, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.12 a game, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.86 a game, 10th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.10 a game, 86th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 49.0%, 37th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.4, 11th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 50.5%, 53rd percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 53rd percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentileChris Wagner: Goals, 0.09 a game, 25th percentileChris Wagner: Assists, 0.05 a game, 5th percentileChris Wagner: Points, 0.14 a game, 10th percentileChris Wagner: Shots, 1.28 a game, 31st percentileChris Wagner: Hits, 2.21 a game, 88th percentileChris Wagner: Corsi for %, 46.2%, 18th percentileChris Wagner: CF% rel, -0.2, 45th percentileChris Wagner: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 38th percentileChris Wagner: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 48th percentileChris Wagner: Chances created, 0.63 xG per 60, 34th percentileChris Wagner: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 5th percentileChris Wagner: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentile
02462040Nate Thompson 6Chris Wagner 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Chris Wagner

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2015-16 Chris Wagner R, COL
49 Games played 43
3 Goals 4
3 Assists 2
6 Points 6
0.12 Points per game 0.14
-1 Plus/minus -2
42 Shots 55
7.1 Shooting % 7.3
103 Hits 95
47 Penalty minutes 28
11:36 Average ice time 9:09
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.0 Corsi for % 46.2
-4.4 CF% relative to team -0.2
50.1 Fenwick for % 46.4
50.5 Expected goals for % 48.5
-5.6 xGF% relative to team +6.0
45.8 Goals for % 43.8
98.9 PDO 99.4
69 Shot attempts taken 85
Expected goals, all situations
4.3 Expected goals 4.1
0.45 Expected goals per 60 0.63
7.6% Chance per attempt 5.8%
-1.3 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
-0.9 Goals above replacement +2.4
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.4
-3.0 Even-strength offence -0.8
+1.8 Even-strength defence +2.0
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.3
-1.3 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$1.6M Cap hit $600K
$267K Cap dollars per point $100K
-$7K Worth at the going rate $2.1M
-$1.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean