Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Freddie Hamilton

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.03 a game, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.07 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.63 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.30 a game, 91st percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 40.7%, 1st percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -11.1, 1st percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 42.2%, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 4.9% a shot, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 51st percentileFreddie Hamilton: Goals, 0.08 a game, 16th percentileFreddie Hamilton: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileFreddie Hamilton: Points, 0.08 a game, 2nd percentileFreddie Hamilton: Shots, 1.15 a game, 22nd percentileFreddie Hamilton: Hits, 1.77 a game, 79th percentileFreddie Hamilton: Corsi for %, 46.9%, 18th percentileFreddie Hamilton: CF% rel, -5.2, 7th percentileFreddie Hamilton: On-ice xG %, 43.2%, 6th percentileFreddie Hamilton: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 15th percentileFreddie Hamilton: Chances created, 0.66 xG per 60, 36th percentileFreddie Hamilton: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 28th percentileFreddie Hamilton: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 45th percentile
00.511.5220Nate Thompson 2Freddie Hamilton 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Freddie Hamilton

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2016-17 Freddie Hamilton C, ARI
30 Games played 26
1 Goals 2
1 Assists 0
2 Points 2
0.07 Points per game 0.08
4 Plus/minus -3
19 Shots 30
5.3 Shooting % 6.7
69 Hits 46
14 Penalty minutes 8
10:23 Average ice time 9:47
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.7 Corsi for % 46.9
-11.1 CF% relative to team -5.2
39.7 Fenwick for % 43.5
42.2 Expected goals for % 43.2
-12.4 xGF% relative to team -4.9
77.8 Goals for % 41.7
106.0 PDO 99.4
31 Shot attempts taken 49
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 2.8
0.23 Expected goals per 60 0.66
4.9% Chance per attempt 7.0%
-0.2 Goals above expected -0.8
Rating, in goals
-1.7 Goals above replacement -0.9
-0.3 Wins above replacement -0.1
-2.9 Even-strength offence -1.3
+0.1 Even-strength defence -0.5
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.0 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$1.6M Cap hit $613K
$800K Cap dollars per point $306K
-$502K Worth at the going rate $24K
-$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$589K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean