Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Blake Coleman

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.03 a game, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.07 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.63 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.30 a game, 91st percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 40.7%, 1st percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -11.1, 1st percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 42.2%, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 4.9% a shot, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 51st percentileBlake Coleman: Goals, 0.04 a game, 7th percentileBlake Coleman: Assists, 0.04 a game, 4th percentileBlake Coleman: Points, 0.09 a game, 3rd percentileBlake Coleman: Shots, 1.26 a game, 29th percentileBlake Coleman: Hits, 2.22 a game, 90th percentileBlake Coleman: Corsi for %, 44.0%, 5th percentileBlake Coleman: CF% rel, -8.0, 3rd percentileBlake Coleman: On-ice xG %, 44.6%, 13th percentileBlake Coleman: Rating, -1.2 goals above replacement, 13th percentileBlake Coleman: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 18th percentileBlake Coleman: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 35th percentileBlake Coleman: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 35th percentile
00.511.5220Nate Thompson 2Blake Coleman 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Blake Coleman

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2016-17 Blake Coleman L, MIN
30 Games played 23
1 Goals 1
1 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.07 Points per game 0.09
4 Plus/minus -7
19 Shots 29
5.3 Shooting % 3.4
69 Hits 51
14 Penalty minutes 27
10:23 Average ice time 12:51
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.7 Corsi for % 44.0
-11.1 CF% relative to team -8.0
39.7 Fenwick for % 45.4
42.2 Expected goals for % 44.6
-12.4 xGF% relative to team -6.0
77.8 Goals for % 23.1
106.0 PDO 95.2
31 Shot attempts taken 43
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 2.7
0.23 Expected goals per 60 0.55
4.9% Chance per attempt 7.2%
-0.2 Goals above expected -1.7
Rating, in goals
-1.7 Goals above replacement -1.2
-0.3 Wins above replacement -0.2
-2.9 Even-strength offence -1.8
+0.1 Even-strength defence +1.0
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.3 Penalty kill -0.4
+0.0 Penalties -0.8
Contract
$1.6M Cap hit $680K
$800K Cap dollars per point $340K
-$502K Worth at the going rate -$172K
-$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$852K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean