Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Anton Blidh

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.03 a game, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.07 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.63 a game, 2nd percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.30 a game, 91st percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 40.7%, 1st percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -11.1, 1st percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 42.2%, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 4.9% a shot, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 51st percentileAnton Blidh: Goals, 0.05 a game, 9th percentileAnton Blidh: Assists, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileAnton Blidh: Points, 0.11 a game, 5th percentileAnton Blidh: Shots, 1.37 a game, 36th percentileAnton Blidh: Hits, 2.16 a game, 89th percentileAnton Blidh: Corsi for %, 57.0%, 98th percentileAnton Blidh: CF% rel, -0.5, 42nd percentileAnton Blidh: On-ice xG %, 57.2%, 96th percentileAnton Blidh: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 30th percentileAnton Blidh: Chances created, 0.95 xG per 60, 84th percentileAnton Blidh: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 33rd percentileAnton Blidh: Finishing, -1.6 goals above expected, 37th percentile
00.511.5220Nate Thompson 2Anton Blidh 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Anton Blidh

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2016-17 Anton Blidh L, NYR
30 Games played 19
1 Goals 1
1 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.07 Points per game 0.11
4 Plus/minus -2
19 Shots 26
5.3 Shooting % 3.8
69 Hits 41
14 Penalty minutes 7
10:23 Average ice time 8:47
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.7 Corsi for % 57.0
-11.1 CF% relative to team -0.5
39.7 Fenwick for % 58.3
42.2 Expected goals for % 57.2
-12.4 xGF% relative to team +1.1
77.8 Goals for % 42.9
106.0 PDO 96.7
31 Shot attempts taken 45
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 2.6
0.23 Expected goals per 60 0.95
4.9% Chance per attempt 7.1%
-0.2 Goals above expected -1.6
Rating, in goals
-1.7 Goals above replacement +0.7
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
-2.9 Even-strength offence +0.1
+0.1 Even-strength defence 0.0
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.3 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.0 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$1.6M Cap hit $784K
$800K Cap dollars per point $392K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean