Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Tomas Nosek

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.21 a game, 15th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.96 a game, 11th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.69 a game, 78th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 47.7%, 21st percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -7.2, 3rd percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.3%, 24th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -2.7 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 7th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 58th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -3.3 goals above expected, 15th percentileTomas Nosek: Goals, 0.12 a game, 30th percentileTomas Nosek: Assists, 0.10 a game, 14th percentileTomas Nosek: Points, 0.22 a game, 18th percentileTomas Nosek: Shots, 1.39 a game, 34th percentileTomas Nosek: Hits, 1.36 a game, 68th percentileTomas Nosek: Corsi for %, 52.0%, 67th percentileTomas Nosek: CF% rel, -3.3, 16th percentileTomas Nosek: On-ice xG %, 53.7%, 77th percentileTomas Nosek: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 25th percentileTomas Nosek: Chances created, 0.88 xG per 60, 67th percentileTomas Nosek: Shot quality, 9.4% a shot, 85th percentileTomas Nosek: Finishing, -3.3 goals above expected, 15th percentile
051015204060Nate Thompson 15Tomas Nosek 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Tomas Nosek

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2019-20 Tomas Nosek L, FLA
70 Games played 67
4 Goals 8
11 Assists 7
15 Points 15
0.21 Points per game 0.22
-1 Plus/minus -2
67 Shots 93
6.0 Shooting % 8.6
118 Hits 91
30 Penalty minutes 20
12:47 Average ice time 11:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.7 Corsi for % 52.0
-7.2 CF% relative to team -3.3
48.9 Fenwick for % 52.3
47.3 Expected goals for % 53.7
-7.7 xGF% relative to team -3.7
43.8 Goals for % 46.0
98.3 PDO 98.1
102 Shot attempts taken 145
Expected goals, all situations
7.3 Expected goals 11.3
0.49 Expected goals per 60 0.88
8.3% Chance per attempt 9.4%
-3.3 Goals above expected -3.3
Rating, in goals
-2.7 Goals above replacement +0.5
-0.4 Wins above replacement +0.1
-3.5 Even-strength offence -1.8
-0.1 Even-strength defence +0.9
-0.1 Power play +0.1
-0.3 Penalty kill -0.9
-1.2 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1M Cap hit $1M
$67K Cap dollars per point $67K
-$1.5M Worth at the going rate $1.1M
-$2.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$61K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean