Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Drew Miller John Mitchell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDrew Miller: Goals, 0.09 a game, 22nd percentileDrew Miller: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileDrew Miller: Points, 0.13 a game, 8th percentileDrew Miller: Shots, 0.78 a game, 4th percentileDrew Miller: Hits, 1.29 a game, 65th percentileDrew Miller: Corsi for %, 43.0%, 3rd percentileDrew Miller: CF% rel, -6.0, 6th percentileDrew Miller: On-ice xG %, 45.5%, 15th percentileDrew Miller: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentileDrew Miller: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 14th percentileDrew Miller: Shot quality, 8.8% a shot, 84th percentileDrew Miller: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentileJohn Mitchell: Goals, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileJohn Mitchell: Assists, 0.06 a game, 9th percentileJohn Mitchell: Points, 0.11 a game, 5th percentileJohn Mitchell: Shots, 0.88 a game, 10th percentileJohn Mitchell: Hits, 1.35 a game, 68th percentileJohn Mitchell: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 39th percentileJohn Mitchell: CF% rel, 1.5, 62nd percentileJohn Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 41.9%, 3rd percentileJohn Mitchell: Rating, -2.0 goals above replacement, 6th percentileJohn Mitchell: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 1st percentileJohn Mitchell: Shot quality, 5.9% a shot, 5th percentileJohn Mitchell: Finishing, -2.0 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
0246204060Drew Miller 7John Mitchell 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Drew Miller
John Mitchell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Drew Miller L, DET 2016-17 John Mitchell C, COL
55 Games played 65
5 Goals 3
2 Assists 4
7 Points 7
0.13 Points per game 0.11
-12 Plus/minus -12
43 Shots 57
11.6 Shooting % 5.3
71 Hits 88
18 Penalty minutes 45
10:17 Average ice time 12:33
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.0 Corsi for % 49.3
-6.0 CF% relative to team +1.5
44.7 Fenwick for % 46.9
45.5 Expected goals for % 41.9
-3.1 xGF% relative to team -3.1
32.1 Goals for % 31.4
96.6 PDO 97.1
64 Shot attempts taken 121
Expected goals, all situations
4.9 Expected goals 5.0
0.52 Expected goals per 60 0.37
8.8% Chance per attempt 5.9%
+0.1 Goals above expected -2.0
Rating, in goals
-0.4 Goals above replacement -2.0
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.3
-1.6 Even-strength offence -5.3
+1.2 Even-strength defence +2.8
-0.1 Power play -0.2
-0.5 Penalty kill 0.0
-1.0 Penalties -1.5
Contract
$1.025M Cap hit $1.8M
$146K Cap dollars per point $257K
$322K Worth at the going rate -$669K
-$703K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean