Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Drew Miller Torrey Mitchell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDrew Miller: Goals, 0.09 a game, 29th percentileDrew Miller: Assists, 0.09 a game, 18th percentileDrew Miller: Points, 0.18 a game, 19th percentileDrew Miller: Shots, 1.23 a game, 31st percentileDrew Miller: Hits, 1.84 a game, 77th percentileDrew Miller: Corsi for %, 47.3%, 28th percentileDrew Miller: CF% rel, -7.6, 5th percentileDrew Miller: On-ice xG %, 48.2%, 37th percentileDrew Miller: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileDrew Miller: Chances created, 0.66 xG per 60, 44th percentileDrew Miller: Shot quality, 9.0% a shot, 91st percentileDrew Miller: Finishing, -2.7 goals above expected, 16th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Goals, 0.09 a game, 29th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Assists, 0.09 a game, 17th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Points, 0.18 a game, 18th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shots, 0.87 a game, 12th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Hits, 1.04 a game, 44th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 15th percentileTorrey Mitchell: CF% rel, -5.4, 12th percentileTorrey Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 46.8%, 28th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: Chances created, 0.58 xG per 60, 27th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 50th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 45th percentile
024682040Drew Miller 8Torrey Mitchell 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Drew Miller
Torrey Mitchell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Drew Miller L, DET 2012-13 Torrey Mitchell C, LAK
44 Games played 45
4 Goals 4
4 Assists 4
8 Points 8
0.18 Points per game 0.18
-8 Plus/minus -8
54 Shots 39
7.4 Shooting % 10.3
81 Hits 47
2 Penalty minutes 21
13:49 Average ice time 10:30
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.3 Corsi for % 45.3
-7.6 CF% relative to team -5.4
48.4 Fenwick for % 45.6
48.2 Expected goals for % 46.8
-5.0 xGF% relative to team -7.4
37.0 Goals for % 33.3
97.3 PDO 96.4
84 Shot attempts taken 67
Expected goals, all situations
6.7 Expected goals 4.5
0.66 Expected goals per 60 0.58
9.0% Chance per attempt 7.4%
-2.7 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+1.5 Goals above replacement +2.1
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.4
-1.5 Even-strength offence -1.8
+0.8 Even-strength defence +1.5
+0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.3 Penalties +0.9
Contract
$838K Cap hit $1.9M
$105K Cap dollars per point $238K
$1.8M Worth at the going rate $2.4M
+$952K Value: worth minus cap hit +$479K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean