Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Toby Enstrom Paul Postma

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerToby Enstrom: Goals, 0.02 a game, 16th percentileToby Enstrom: Assists, 0.22 a game, 55th percentileToby Enstrom: Points, 0.23 a game, 46th percentileToby Enstrom: Shots, 0.77 a game, 10th percentileToby Enstrom: Hits, 0.40 a game, 6th percentileToby Enstrom: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 46th percentileToby Enstrom: CF% rel, -1.3, 33rd percentileToby Enstrom: On-ice xG %, 50.8%, 59th percentileToby Enstrom: Rating, -0.7 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileToby Enstrom: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 2nd percentileToby Enstrom: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 21st percentileToby Enstrom: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 40th percentilePaul Postma: Goals, 0.02 a game, 16th percentilePaul Postma: Assists, 0.20 a game, 52nd percentilePaul Postma: Points, 0.22 a game, 40th percentilePaul Postma: Shots, 0.77 a game, 10th percentilePaul Postma: Hits, 0.55 a game, 13th percentilePaul Postma: Corsi for %, 48.4%, 33rd percentilePaul Postma: CF% rel, -1.9, 26th percentilePaul Postma: On-ice xG %, 47.2%, 26th percentilePaul Postma: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 28th percentilePaul Postma: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 50th percentilePaul Postma: Shot quality, 3.2% a shot, 57th percentilePaul Postma: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 29th percentile
0510204060Toby Enstrom 14Paul Postma 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Toby Enstrom
Paul Postma

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Toby Enstrom D, WPG 2016-17 Paul Postma D, BOS
60 Games played 65
1 Goals 1
13 Assists 13
14 Points 14
0.23 Points per game 0.22
-7 Plus/minus 3
46 Shots 50
2.2 Shooting % 2.0
24 Hits 36
42 Penalty minutes 15
21:54 Average ice time 10:51
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.3 Corsi for % 48.4
-1.3 CF% relative to team -1.9
48.9 Fenwick for % 48.0
50.8 Expected goals for % 47.2
+0.7 xGF% relative to team -4.9
42.2 Goals for % 52.9
97.6 PDO 101.3
92 Shot attempts taken 119
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 2.2
0.08 Expected goals per 60 0.19
2.6% Chance per attempt 3.2%
-0.7 Goals above expected -1.2
Rating, in goals
-0.7 Goals above replacement -0.4
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
-3.3 Even-strength offence +0.1
+0.5 Even-strength defence -1.6
-0.5 Power play +0.0
-0.5 Penalty kill +0.0
-1.3 Penalties -1.2
Contract
$5.75M Cap hit $888K
$411K Cap dollars per point $63K
$153K Worth at the going rate $340K
-$5.6M Value: worth minus cap hit -$548K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean