Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Toby Enstrom Nate Schmidt

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerToby Enstrom: Goals, 0.03 a game, 27th percentileToby Enstrom: Assists, 0.19 a game, 52nd percentileToby Enstrom: Points, 0.22 a game, 44th percentileToby Enstrom: Shots, 0.69 a game, 10th percentileToby Enstrom: Hits, 0.35 a game, 3rd percentileToby Enstrom: Corsi for %, 51.8%, 72nd percentileToby Enstrom: CF% rel, 0.1, 54th percentileToby Enstrom: On-ice xG %, 49.0%, 40th percentileToby Enstrom: Rating, -3.1 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileToby Enstrom: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 5th percentileToby Enstrom: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 31st percentileToby Enstrom: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 52nd percentileNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.03 a game, 27th percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.19 a game, 52nd percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.22 a game, 44th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.11 a game, 41st percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.96 a game, 38th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 61st percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 0.3, 58th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 50.9%, 62nd percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +8.3 goals above replacement, 88th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 55th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 67th percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 9th percentile
051015204060Toby Enstrom 16Nate Schmidt 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Toby Enstrom
Nate Schmidt

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Toby Enstrom D, WPG 2015-16 Nate Schmidt D, UTA
72 Games played 72
2 Goals 2
14 Assists 14
16 Points 16
0.22 Points per game 0.22
8 Plus/minus 12
50 Shots 80
4.0 Shooting % 2.5
25 Hits 69
44 Penalty minutes 16
20:51 Average ice time 18:04
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.8 Corsi for % 50.7
+0.1 CF% relative to team +0.3
50.4 Fenwick for % 51.0
49.0 Expected goals for % 50.9
-1.2 xGF% relative to team -0.2
52.8 Goals for % 55.8
100.9 PDO 101.1
102 Shot attempts taken 170
Expected goals, all situations
2.1 Expected goals 4.4
0.08 Expected goals per 60 0.20
2.7% Chance per attempt 3.5%
-0.1 Goals above expected -2.4
Rating, in goals
-3.1 Goals above replacement +8.3
-0.5 Wins above replacement +1.4
-2.6 Even-strength offence -0.7
-1.9 Even-strength defence +2.6
-1.1 Power play -0.1
-0.8 Penalty kill +0.2
-1.6 Penalties +2.0
Contract
$5.75M Cap hit $813K
$359K Cap dollars per point $51K
-$1.4M Worth at the going rate $5.8M
-$7.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean