Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Tanner Glass Gregory Campbell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Glass: Goals, 0.06 a game, 21st percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.14 a game, 32nd percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.21 a game, 23rd percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 1.10 a game, 24th percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 3.15 a game, 98th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 42.4%, 3rd percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -10.5, 1st percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 41.8%, 3rd percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -5.9 goals above replacement, 1st percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.41 xG per 60, 5th percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 26th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 30th percentileGregory Campbell: Goals, 0.10 a game, 34th percentileGregory Campbell: Assists, 0.10 a game, 22nd percentileGregory Campbell: Points, 0.21 a game, 23rd percentileGregory Campbell: Shots, 0.95 a game, 17th percentileGregory Campbell: Hits, 1.37 a game, 65th percentileGregory Campbell: Corsi for %, 45.6%, 12th percentileGregory Campbell: CF% rel, -11.0, 1st percentileGregory Campbell: On-ice xG %, 47.2%, 26th percentileGregory Campbell: Rating, -1.9 goals above replacement, 7th percentileGregory Campbell: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 10th percentileGregory Campbell: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 57th percentileGregory Campbell: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 53rd percentile
051015204060Tanner Glass 16Gregory Campbell 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Glass
Gregory Campbell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Glass L, CGY 2011-12 Gregory Campbell C, CBJ
78 Games played 78
5 Goals 8
11 Assists 8
16 Points 16
0.21 Points per game 0.21
-12 Plus/minus -3
86 Shots 74
5.8 Shooting % 10.8
246 Hits 107
73 Penalty minutes 80
13:25 Average ice time 12:48
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
42.4 Corsi for % 45.6
-10.5 CF% relative to team -11.0
43.6 Fenwick for % 46.4
41.8 Expected goals for % 47.2
-12.5 xGF% relative to team -8.4
41.0 Goals for % 44.4
99.4 PDO 99.9
123 Shot attempts taken 120
Expected goals, all situations
7.2 Expected goals 7.9
0.41 Expected goals per 60 0.48
6.6% Chance per attempt 7.7%
-2.2 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
-5.9 Goals above replacement -1.9
-1.0 Wins above replacement -0.3
-5.2 Even-strength offence -4.1
-2.4 Even-strength defence -0.4
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.7 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.3 Penalties 0.0
Contract
$750K Cap hit $1.1M
$47K Cap dollars per point $69K
-$2.2M Worth at the going rate -$370K
-$2.9M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean