Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Tanner Glass John Mitchell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Glass: Goals, 0.06 a game, 21st percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.14 a game, 32nd percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.21 a game, 23rd percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 1.10 a game, 24th percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 3.15 a game, 98th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 42.4%, 3rd percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -10.5, 1st percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 41.8%, 3rd percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -5.9 goals above replacement, 1st percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.41 xG per 60, 5th percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 26th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 30th percentileJohn Mitchell: Goals, 0.08 a game, 25th percentileJohn Mitchell: Assists, 0.17 a game, 41st percentileJohn Mitchell: Points, 0.25 a game, 33rd percentileJohn Mitchell: Shots, 1.02 a game, 19th percentileJohn Mitchell: Hits, 1.41 a game, 66th percentileJohn Mitchell: Corsi for %, 53.3%, 78th percentileJohn Mitchell: CF% rel, 5.3, 90th percentileJohn Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 58.4%, 97th percentileJohn Mitchell: Rating, +5.0 goals above replacement, 69th percentileJohn Mitchell: Chances created, 0.88 xG per 60, 77th percentileJohn Mitchell: Shot quality, 10.6% a shot, 98th percentileJohn Mitchell: Finishing, -5.4 goals above expected, 8th percentile
051015204060Tanner Glass 16John Mitchell 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Glass
John Mitchell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Glass L, CGY 2011-12 John Mitchell C, COL
78 Games played 63
5 Goals 5
11 Assists 11
16 Points 16
0.21 Points per game 0.25
-12 Plus/minus 10
86 Shots 64
5.8 Shooting % 7.8
246 Hits 89
73 Penalty minutes 8
13:25 Average ice time 10:10
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
42.4 Corsi for % 53.3
-10.5 CF% relative to team +5.3
43.6 Fenwick for % 56.0
41.8 Expected goals for % 58.4
-12.5 xGF% relative to team +6.5
41.0 Goals for % 62.2
99.4 PDO 101.6
123 Shot attempts taken 109
Expected goals, all situations
7.2 Expected goals 9.4
0.41 Expected goals per 60 0.88
6.6% Chance per attempt 10.6%
-2.2 Goals above expected -5.4
Rating, in goals
-5.9 Goals above replacement +5.0
-1.0 Wins above replacement +0.8
-5.2 Even-strength offence +1.1
-2.4 Even-strength defence +1.4
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.7 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.3 Penalties +0.9

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean