Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Tanner Glass Richard Panik

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Glass: Goals, 0.06 a game, 13th percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.13 a game, 26th percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.19 a game, 20th percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 0.84 a game, 11th percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 3.69 a game, 99th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 39.6%, 1st percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -11.3, 1st percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 42.6%, 8th percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 20th percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.30 xG per 60, 1st percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 4th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 43rd percentileRichard Panik: Goals, 0.06 a game, 14th percentileRichard Panik: Assists, 0.20 a game, 43rd percentileRichard Panik: Points, 0.26 a game, 29th percentileRichard Panik: Shots, 1.12 a game, 23rd percentileRichard Panik: Hits, 1.40 a game, 61st percentileRichard Panik: Corsi for %, 48.3%, 30th percentileRichard Panik: CF% rel, -4.5, 13th percentileRichard Panik: On-ice xG %, 46.8%, 27th percentileRichard Panik: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 17th percentileRichard Panik: Chances created, 0.46 xG per 60, 10th percentileRichard Panik: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 3rd percentileRichard Panik: Finishing, -1.9 goals above expected, 33rd percentile
0510204060Tanner Glass 13Richard Panik 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Glass
Richard Panik

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Glass L, CGY 2013-14 Richard Panik R, NYI
67 Games played 50
4 Goals 3
9 Assists 10
13 Points 13
0.19 Points per game 0.26
-8 Plus/minus -9
56 Shots 56
7.1 Shooting % 5.4
247 Hits 70
90 Penalty minutes 21
11:47 Average ice time 12:42
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
39.6 Corsi for % 48.3
-11.3 CF% relative to team -4.5
41.9 Fenwick for % 47.3
42.6 Expected goals for % 46.8
-9.8 xGF% relative to team -6.9
37.1 Goals for % 35.3
98.2 PDO 96.4
86 Shot attempts taken 96
Expected goals, all situations
4.0 Expected goals 4.9
0.30 Expected goals per 60 0.46
5.7% Chance per attempt 5.6%
-1.0 Goals above expected -1.9
Rating, in goals
-0.5 Goals above replacement -0.8
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
-4.5 Even-strength offence -3.2
+2.1 Even-strength defence -0.2
0.0 Power play -0.4
-0.3 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.1 Penalties +1.2
Contract
$1.1M Cap hit $740K
$85K Cap dollars per point $57K
$235K Worth at the going rate $61K
-$865K Value: worth minus cap hit -$679K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean