Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Tanner Glass Michael Latta

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Glass: Goals, 0.02 a game, 2nd percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.08 a game, 9th percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.09 a game, 3rd percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 0.80 a game, 6th percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 3.23 a game, 96th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 43.5%, 10th percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -7.8, 4th percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 42.6%, 9th percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -4.4 goals above replacement, 1st percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.36 xG per 60, 2nd percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 4th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -3.0 goals above expected, 20th percentileMichael Latta: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMichael Latta: Assists, 0.11 a game, 22nd percentileMichael Latta: Points, 0.11 a game, 5th percentileMichael Latta: Shots, 0.45 a game, 1st percentileMichael Latta: Hits, 1.72 a game, 72nd percentileMichael Latta: Corsi for %, 50.9%, 54th percentileMichael Latta: CF% rel, 0.1, 48th percentileMichael Latta: On-ice xG %, 56.1%, 88th percentileMichael Latta: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileMichael Latta: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 1st percentileMichael Latta: Shot quality, 5.0% a shot, 1st percentileMichael Latta: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 37th percentile
0246204060Tanner Glass 6Michael Latta 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Glass
Michael Latta

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Glass L, CGY 2014-15 Michael Latta C, WSH
66 Games played 53
1 Goals 0
5 Assists 6
6 Points 6
0.09 Points per game 0.11
-12 Plus/minus 4
53 Shots 24
1.9 Shooting % 0.0
213 Hits 91
98 Penalty minutes 68
10:15 Average ice time 8:23
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.5 Corsi for % 50.9
-7.8 CF% relative to team +0.1
42.6 Fenwick for % 53.0
42.6 Expected goals for % 56.1
-8.1 xGF% relative to team +3.3
33.3 Goals for % 60.0
96.8 PDO 101.7
81 Shot attempts taken 51
Expected goals, all situations
4.0 Expected goals 1.7
0.36 Expected goals per 60 0.24
5.7% Chance per attempt 5.0%
-3.0 Goals above expected -1.7
Rating, in goals
-4.4 Goals above replacement +1.1
-0.7 Wins above replacement +0.2
-4.3 Even-strength offence -1.9
-1.0 Even-strength defence +1.8
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.9 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$1.45M Cap hit $575K
$242K Cap dollars per point $96K
-$2.1M Worth at the going rate $1.2M
-$3.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$635K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean