Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Tanner Glass Jason Dickinson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Glass: Goals, 0.09 a game, 22nd percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.09 a game, 16th percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.18 a game, 16th percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 0.73 a game, 3rd percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 3.36 a game, 99th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 47.7%, 25th percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -1.1, 36th percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 26th percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.85 xG per 60, 72nd percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 11.3% a shot, 99th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 46th percentileJason Dickinson: Goals, 0.20 a game, 61st percentileJason Dickinson: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJason Dickinson: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileJason Dickinson: Shots, 0.90 a game, 12th percentileJason Dickinson: Hits, 0.80 a game, 38th percentileJason Dickinson: Corsi for %, 53.4%, 82nd percentileJason Dickinson: CF% rel, 4.4, 88th percentileJason Dickinson: On-ice xG %, 57.5%, 96th percentileJason Dickinson: Rating, +1.3 goals above replacement, 34th percentileJason Dickinson: Chances created, 0.78 xG per 60, 62nd percentileJason Dickinson: Shot quality, 10.9% a shot, 99th percentileJason Dickinson: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 59th percentile
00.511.52Tanner Glass 2Jason Dickinson 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Glass
Jason Dickinson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Glass L, CGY 2016-17 Jason Dickinson C, EDM
11 Games played 10
1 Goals 2
1 Assists 0
2 Points 2
0.18 Points per game 0.20
0 Plus/minus -3
8 Shots 9
12.5 Shooting % 22.2
37 Hits 8
17 Penalty minutes 0
10:55 Average ice time 11:47
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.7 Corsi for % 53.4
-1.1 CF% relative to team +4.4
47.3 Fenwick for % 53.6
47.4 Expected goals for % 57.5
-1.5 xGF% relative to team +7.9
50.0 Goals for % 28.6
100.6 PDO 93.2
18 Shot attempts taken 18
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 1.5
0.85 Expected goals per 60 0.78
11.3% Chance per attempt 10.9%
-0.7 Goals above expected +0.5
Rating, in goals
-0.2 Goals above replacement +1.3
0.0 Wins above replacement +0.2
-0.2 Even-strength offence -0.4
-0.1 Even-strength defence +0.9
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.2 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$1.45M Cap hit $894K
$725K Cap dollars per point $447K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean