Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott Curtis Sanford

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.940, 98th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 1.53 a game, 98th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 25.6 shots a game, 12th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 38 games, 32nd percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, +0.60 above expected per 60, 94th percentileCurtis Sanford: Save %, 0.911, 34th percentileCurtis Sanford: Goals against, 2.39 a game, 44th percentileCurtis Sanford: Workload, 27.0 shots a game, 38th percentileCurtis Sanford: Games, 36 games, 30th percentileCurtis Sanford: Goals saved, -0.26 above expected per 60, 19th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 50 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2011-12 Curtis Sanford G, CBJ
38 Games played 36
23 Wins 10
10 Losses 18
9 Shutouts 1
972 Shots against 971
914 Saves 885
58 Goals against 86
0.940 Save % 0.911
1.56 Goals against average 2.60
Expected goals, while he was in net
80.3 Expected goals against 77.2
+22.3 Goals saved above expected -8.8
+0.60 Saved above expected per 60 -0.26
5.9% Chance per attempt faced 5.8%
Rating, in goals
+30.5 Goals above replacement -0.9
+5.1 Wins above replacement -0.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean