Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott Cam Ward

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.922, 77th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 1.71 a game, 94th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 22.0 shots a game, 1st percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 31 games, 43rd percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, +0.16 above expected per 60, 71st percentileCam Ward: Save %, 0.898, 12th percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.80 a game, 11th percentileCam Ward: Workload, 27.5 shots a game, 49th percentileCam Ward: Games, 30 games, 42nd percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, -0.32 above expected per 60, 19th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 65 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2013-14 Cam Ward G, CHI
31 Games played 30
18 Wins 10
6 Losses 12
4 Shutouts 0
681 Shots against 824
628 Saves 740
53 Goals against 84
0.922 Save % 0.898
1.96 Goals against average 3.06
Expected goals, while he was in net
57.3 Expected goals against 75.2
+4.3 Goals saved above expected -8.8
+0.16 Saved above expected per 60 -0.32
5.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
+10.2 Goals above replacement -1.2
+1.7 Wins above replacement -0.2
Contract
$1.8M Cap hit $6.3M
$2.6M Worth at the going rate $299K
+$787K Value: worth minus cap hit -$6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean