Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott Cam Ward

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.917, 57th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 2.09 a game, 91st percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 25.0 shots a game, 13th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 46 games, 48th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, -0.08 above expected per 60, 31st percentileCam Ward: Save %, 0.910, 31st percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.37 a game, 46th percentileCam Ward: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 35th percentileCam Ward: Games, 51 games, 56th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, -0.01 above expected per 60, 53rd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2014-15 Cam Ward G, CHI
46 Games played 51
26 Wins 22
14 Losses 24
5 Shutouts 1
1,150 Shots against 1,351
1,054 Saves 1,230
96 Goals against 121
0.917 Save % 0.910
2.26 Goals against average 2.40
Expected goals, while he was in net
92.5 Expected goals against 120.4
-3.5 Goals saved above expected -0.6
-0.08 Saved above expected per 60 -0.01
5.7% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
+5.9 Goals above replacement +11.7
+1.0 Wins above replacement +1.9
Contract
$2.5M Cap hit $6.3M
$1.8M Worth at the going rate $3.1M
-$652K Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean