Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott Scott Darling

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.909, 37th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 2.60 a game, 37th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 28.6 shots a game, 35th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 43 games, 50th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, -0.04 above expected per 60, 43rd percentileScott Darling: Save %, 0.888, 1st percentileScott Darling: Goals against, 3.05 a game, 10th percentileScott Darling: Workload, 27.2 shots a game, 20th percentileScott Darling: Games, 43 games, 50th percentileScott Darling: Goals saved, -0.55 above expected per 60, 3rd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 60 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2017-18 Scott Darling G, CAR
43 Games played 43
23 Wins 13
11 Losses 21
1 Shutouts 0
1,228 Shots against 1,171
1,116 Saves 1,040
112 Goals against 131
0.909 Save % 0.888
2.66 Goals against average 3.18
Expected goals, while he was in net
110.3 Expected goals against 108.3
-1.7 Goals saved above expected -22.7
-0.04 Saved above expected per 60 -0.55
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
+9.6 Goals above replacement -11.6
+1.6 Wins above replacement -1.9
Contract
$2.75M Cap hit $4.15M
$2.8M Worth at the going rate -$2M
+$46K Value: worth minus cap hit -$6.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean