Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott Frederik Andersen

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.930, 98th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 1.86 a game, 97th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 29th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 42 games, 58th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, +0.61 above expected per 60, 98th percentileFrederik Andersen: Save %, 0.919, 68th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals against, 2.05 a game, 89th percentileFrederik Andersen: Workload, 25.3 shots a game, 13th percentileFrederik Andersen: Games, 43 games, 60th percentileFrederik Andersen: Goals saved, +0.04 above expected per 60, 58th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2015-16 Frederik Andersen G, CAR
42 Games played 43
23 Wins 22
8 Losses 9
4 Shutouts 3
1,113 Shots against 1,086
1,035 Saves 998
78 Goals against 88
0.930 Save % 0.919
2.07 Goals against average 2.30
Expected goals, while he was in net
101.0 Expected goals against 89.7
+23.0 Goals saved above expected +1.7
+0.61 Saved above expected per 60 +0.04
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 5.8%
Rating, in goals
+33.2 Goals above replacement +10.8
+5.5 Wins above replacement +1.8
Contract
$2.5M Cap hit $1.15M
$8.5M Worth at the going rate $3.2M
+$6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean