Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott John Gibson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.930, 98th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 1.86 a game, 97th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 29th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 42 games, 58th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, +0.61 above expected per 60, 98th percentileJohn Gibson: Save %, 0.920, 77th percentileJohn Gibson: Goals against, 1.98 a game, 92nd percentileJohn Gibson: Workload, 24.8 shots a game, 10th percentileJohn Gibson: Games, 40 games, 53rd percentileJohn Gibson: Goals saved, +0.13 above expected per 60, 72nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2015-16 John Gibson G, DET
42 Games played 40
23 Wins 21
8 Losses 13
4 Shutouts 4
1,113 Shots against 992
1,035 Saves 913
78 Goals against 79
0.930 Save % 0.920
2.07 Goals against average 2.07
Expected goals, while he was in net
101.0 Expected goals against 84.0
+23.0 Goals saved above expected +5.0
+0.61 Saved above expected per 60 +0.13
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 6.0%
Rating, in goals
+33.2 Goals above replacement +13.5
+5.5 Wins above replacement +2.3
Contract
$2.5M Cap hit $753K
$8.5M Worth at the going rate $3.8M
+$6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean