Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott Matt Murray

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.910, 25th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 2.47 a game, 40th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 27.3 shots a game, 36th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 49 games, 49th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, -0.13 above expected per 60, 22nd percentileMatt Murray: Save %, 0.923, 80th percentileMatt Murray: Goals against, 2.27 a game, 69th percentileMatt Murray: Workload, 29.6 shots a game, 71st percentileMatt Murray: Games, 49 games, 49th percentileMatt Murray: Goals saved, +0.38 above expected per 60, 87th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2016-17 Matt Murray G, SEA
49 Games played 49
26 Wins 32
18 Losses 10
2 Shutouts 4
1,338 Shots against 1,450
1,217 Saves 1,339
121 Goals against 111
0.910 Save % 0.923
2.55 Goals against average 2.41
Expected goals, while he was in net
114.7 Expected goals against 128.7
-6.3 Goals saved above expected +17.7
-0.13 Saved above expected per 60 +0.38
6.2% Chance per attempt faced 6.6%
Rating, in goals
+5.4 Goals above replacement +30.8
+0.9 Wins above replacement +5.1
Contract
$2.5M Cap hit $628K
$1.8M Worth at the going rate $7.3M
-$747K Value: worth minus cap hit +$6.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean