Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Mike Green Duncan Keith

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMike Green: Goals, 0.34 a game, 99th percentileMike Green: Assists, 0.40 a game, 90th percentileMike Green: Points, 0.74 a game, 98th percentileMike Green: Shots, 2.74 a game, 98th percentileMike Green: Hits, 1.03 a game, 40th percentileMike Green: Corsi for %, 48.5%, 39th percentileMike Green: CF% rel, -2.0, 30th percentileMike Green: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 34th percentileMike Green: Rating, +3.2 goals above replacement, 80th percentileMike Green: Chances created, 0.30 xG per 60, 90th percentileMike Green: Shot quality, 3.4% a shot, 67th percentileMike Green: Finishing, +7.7 goals above expected, 99th percentileDuncan Keith: Goals, 0.06 a game, 57th percentileDuncan Keith: Assists, 0.51 a game, 96th percentileDuncan Keith: Points, 0.57 a game, 91st percentileDuncan Keith: Shots, 1.94 a game, 87th percentileDuncan Keith: Hits, 0.40 a game, 6th percentileDuncan Keith: Corsi for %, 52.5%, 74th percentileDuncan Keith: CF% rel, -2.9, 22nd percentileDuncan Keith: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 74th percentileDuncan Keith: Rating, +2.4 goals above replacement, 65th percentileDuncan Keith: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 67th percentileDuncan Keith: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 70th percentileDuncan Keith: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 19th percentile
010202040Duncan Keith 27Mike Green 26

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mike Green
Duncan Keith

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mike Green D, EDM 2012-13 Duncan Keith D, EDM
35 Games played 47
12 Goals 3
14 Assists 24
26 Points 27
0.74 Points per game 0.57
-3 Plus/minus 16
96 Shots 91
12.5 Shooting % 3.3
36 Hits 19
20 Penalty minutes 31
24:51 Average ice time 24:07
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.5 Corsi for % 52.5
-2.0 CF% relative to team -2.9
48.7 Fenwick for % 53.2
48.1 Expected goals for % 53.4
-3.4 xGF% relative to team -1.5
46.8 Goals for % 61.4
99.9 PDO 102.8
120 Shot attempts taken 112
Expected goals, all situations
4.3 Expected goals 4.1
0.30 Expected goals per 60 0.22
3.4% Chance per attempt 3.5%
+7.7 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
+3.2 Goals above replacement +2.4
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.4
+0.9 Even-strength offence +0.2
-1.1 Even-strength defence -0.7
+1.1 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.6 Penalties -1.0
Contract
$6.083M Cap hit $5.538M
$234K Cap dollars per point $205K
$3.3M Worth at the going rate $2.6M
-$2.8M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean