Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Justin Peters Dan Ellis

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerJustin Peters: Save %, 0.891, 9th percentileJustin Peters: Goals against, 2.89 a game, 4th percentileJustin Peters: Workload, 26.6 shots a game, 39th percentileJustin Peters: Games, 19 games, 28th percentileJustin Peters: Goals saved, -0.26 above expected per 60, 24th percentileDan Ellis: Save %, 0.906, 33rd percentileDan Ellis: Goals against, 2.74 a game, 11th percentileDan Ellis: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 84th percentileDan Ellis: Games, 19 games, 28th percentileDan Ellis: Goals saved, +0.02 above expected per 60, 50th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 57 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Justin Peters G, ARI 2012-13 Dan Ellis G, FLA
19 Games played 19
4 Wins 6
11 Losses 8
1 Shutouts 1
506 Shots against 555
451 Saves 503
55 Goals against 52
0.891 Save % 0.906
3.46 Goals against average 3.13
Expected goals, while he was in net
50.9 Expected goals against 52.3
-4.1 Goals saved above expected +0.3
-0.26 Saved above expected per 60 +0.02
7.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.9%
Rating, in goals
+1.1 Goals above replacement +5.7
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.9
Contract
$538K Cap hit $800K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean