Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Thomas Greiss Mike Smith

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerThomas Greiss: Save %, 0.927, 92nd percentileThomas Greiss: Goals against, 2.02 a game, 92nd percentileThomas Greiss: Workload, 27.6 shots a game, 19th percentileThomas Greiss: Games, 43 games, 56th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals saved, +0.46 above expected per 60, 90th percentileMike Smith: Save %, 0.898, 16th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.60 a game, 53rd percentileMike Smith: Workload, 25.5 shots a game, 9th percentileMike Smith: Games, 42 games, 55th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, -0.17 above expected per 60, 27th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 64 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Thomas Greiss G, STL 2018-19 Mike Smith G, EDM
43 Games played 42
23 Wins 23
14 Losses 16
5 Shutouts 2
1,185 Shots against 1,069
1,098 Saves 960
87 Goals against 109
0.927 Save % 0.898
2.28 Goals against average 2.72
Expected goals, while he was in net
104.4 Expected goals against 102.1
+17.4 Goals saved above expected -6.9
+0.46 Saved above expected per 60 -0.17
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 6.8%
Rating, in goals
+28.1 Goals above replacement +3.5
+4.7 Wins above replacement +0.6
Contract
$3.333M Cap hit $5.667M
$6.4M Worth at the going rate $1.4M
+$3.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$4.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean