Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Thomas Greiss Brian Elliott

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerThomas Greiss: Save %, 0.925, 95th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals against, 2.20 a game, 73rd percentileThomas Greiss: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 77th percentileThomas Greiss: Games, 41 games, 56th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals saved, +0.33 above expected per 60, 91st percentileBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.930, 98th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 1.86 a game, 97th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 29th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 42 games, 58th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, +0.61 above expected per 60, 98th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Thomas Greiss G, STL 2015-16 Brian Elliott G, TBL
41 Games played 42
23 Wins 23
11 Losses 8
1 Shutouts 4
1,197 Shots against 1,113
1,107 Saves 1,035
90 Goals against 78
0.925 Save % 0.930
2.36 Goals against average 2.07
Expected goals, while he was in net
102.7 Expected goals against 101.0
+12.7 Goals saved above expected +23.0
+0.33 Saved above expected per 60 +0.61
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
+23.1 Goals above replacement +33.2
+3.9 Wins above replacement +5.5
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $2.5M
$6.1M Worth at the going rate $8.5M
+$4.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean