Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Thomas Greiss Petr Mrazek

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerThomas Greiss: Save %, 0.913, 40th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals against, 2.47 a game, 38th percentileThomas Greiss: Workload, 28.5 shots a game, 51st percentileThomas Greiss: Games, 51 games, 58th percentileThomas Greiss: Goals saved, +0.15 above expected per 60, 65th percentilePetr Mrazek: Save %, 0.901, 5th percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals against, 2.90 a game, 2nd percentilePetr Mrazek: Workload, 29.2 shots a game, 65th percentilePetr Mrazek: Games, 50 games, 53rd percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals saved, -0.38 above expected per 60, 9th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Thomas Greiss G, STL 2016-17 Petr Mrazek G, ANA
51 Games played 50
26 Wins 18
18 Losses 21
3 Shutouts 1
1,453 Shots against 1,462
1,327 Saves 1,317
126 Goals against 145
0.913 Save % 0.901
2.69 Goals against average 3.04
Expected goals, while he was in net
132.8 Expected goals against 126.8
+6.8 Goals saved above expected -18.2
+0.15 Saved above expected per 60 -0.38
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+20.4 Goals above replacement -5.2
+3.4 Wins above replacement -0.9
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $4M
$5M Worth at the going rate -$562K
+$3.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$4.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean