Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Kevin Porter David Jones

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Porter: Goals, 0.13 a game, 39th percentileKevin Porter: Assists, 0.16 a game, 36th percentileKevin Porter: Points, 0.29 a game, 36th percentileKevin Porter: Shots, 1.19 a game, 28th percentileKevin Porter: Hits, 1.81 a game, 76th percentileKevin Porter: Corsi for %, 44.3%, 12th percentileKevin Porter: CF% rel, 0.2, 53rd percentileKevin Porter: On-ice xG %, 41.2%, 5th percentileKevin Porter: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 44th percentileKevin Porter: Chances created, 0.41 xG per 60, 6th percentileKevin Porter: Shot quality, 6.8% a shot, 29th percentileKevin Porter: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 62nd percentileDavid Jones: Goals, 0.09 a game, 29th percentileDavid Jones: Assists, 0.18 a game, 42nd percentileDavid Jones: Points, 0.27 a game, 32nd percentileDavid Jones: Shots, 1.88 a game, 62nd percentileDavid Jones: Hits, 1.36 a game, 61st percentileDavid Jones: Corsi for %, 46.9%, 24th percentileDavid Jones: CF% rel, -3.2, 22nd percentileDavid Jones: On-ice xG %, 48.0%, 36th percentileDavid Jones: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 26th percentileDavid Jones: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 47th percentileDavid Jones: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 67th percentileDavid Jones: Finishing, -3.3 goals above expected, 12th percentile
0246820Kevin Porter 9David Jones 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Porter
David Jones

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Porter C, PIT 2012-13 David Jones R, MIN
31 Games played 33
4 Goals 3
5 Assists 6
9 Points 9
0.29 Points per game 0.27
-1 Plus/minus -11
37 Shots 62
10.8 Shooting % 4.8
56 Hits 45
10 Penalty minutes 6
15:14 Average ice time 16:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.3 Corsi for % 46.9
+0.2 CF% relative to team -3.2
44.9 Fenwick for % 48.3
41.2 Expected goals for % 48.0
-1.6 xGF% relative to team -2.2
50.0 Goals for % 30.0
101.1 PDO 95.0
52 Shot attempts taken 85
Expected goals, all situations
3.2 Expected goals 6.3
0.41 Expected goals per 60 0.68
6.8% Chance per attempt 7.9%
+0.8 Goals above expected -3.3
Rating, in goals
+1.5 Goals above replacement +0.3
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.3 Even-strength offence -0.4
+1.1 Even-strength defence -0.7
-0.2 Power play -0.5
+0.5 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.2 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$538K Cap hit $4M
$60K Cap dollars per point $444K
$1.8M Worth at the going rate $802K
+$1.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean