Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Kevin Porter Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Porter: Goals, 0.13 a game, 39th percentileKevin Porter: Assists, 0.16 a game, 36th percentileKevin Porter: Points, 0.29 a game, 36th percentileKevin Porter: Shots, 1.19 a game, 28th percentileKevin Porter: Hits, 1.81 a game, 76th percentileKevin Porter: Corsi for %, 44.3%, 12th percentileKevin Porter: CF% rel, 0.2, 53rd percentileKevin Porter: On-ice xG %, 41.2%, 5th percentileKevin Porter: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 44th percentileKevin Porter: Chances created, 0.41 xG per 60, 6th percentileKevin Porter: Shot quality, 6.8% a shot, 29th percentileKevin Porter: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 62nd percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.13 a game, 37th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.16 a game, 35th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.28 a game, 34th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.13 a game, 22nd percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 68th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, 0.7, 58th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 47.7%, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 65th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 52nd percentile
0246820Kevin Porter 9Riley Nash 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Porter
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Porter C, PIT 2012-13 Riley Nash C, NYR
31 Games played 32
4 Goals 4
5 Assists 5
9 Points 9
0.29 Points per game 0.28
-1 Plus/minus -4
37 Shots 36
10.8 Shooting % 11.1
56 Hits 36
10 Penalty minutes 8
15:14 Average ice time 12:48
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.3 Corsi for % 51.7
+0.2 CF% relative to team +0.7
44.9 Fenwick for % 50.3
41.2 Expected goals for % 47.7
-1.6 xGF% relative to team +0.1
50.0 Goals for % 42.9
101.1 PDO 98.0
52 Shot attempts taken 59
Expected goals, all situations
3.2 Expected goals 4.1
0.41 Expected goals per 60 0.60
6.8% Chance per attempt 7.9%
+0.8 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
+1.5 Goals above replacement +2.6
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.4
-1.3 Even-strength offence -0.1
+1.1 Even-strength defence +1.7
-0.2 Power play -0.3
+0.5 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.2 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$538K Cap hit $704K
$60K Cap dollars per point $78K
$1.8M Worth at the going rate $2.8M
+$1.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean