Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Kevin Porter Joakim Andersson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Porter: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileKevin Porter: Assists, 0.07 a game, 11th percentileKevin Porter: Points, 0.07 a game, 3rd percentileKevin Porter: Shots, 0.83 a game, 8th percentileKevin Porter: Hits, 2.34 a game, 90th percentileKevin Porter: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 35th percentileKevin Porter: CF% rel, -5.3, 8th percentileKevin Porter: On-ice xG %, 51.5%, 61st percentileKevin Porter: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 31st percentileKevin Porter: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 11th percentileKevin Porter: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 69th percentileKevin Porter: Finishing, -3.7 goals above expected, 19th percentileJoakim Andersson: Goals, 0.03 a game, 6th percentileJoakim Andersson: Assists, 0.07 a game, 11th percentileJoakim Andersson: Points, 0.10 a game, 6th percentileJoakim Andersson: Shots, 0.59 a game, 2nd percentileJoakim Andersson: Hits, 0.48 a game, 15th percentileJoakim Andersson: Corsi for %, 48.5%, 33rd percentileJoakim Andersson: CF% rel, -2.3, 22nd percentileJoakim Andersson: On-ice xG %, 49.6%, 46th percentileJoakim Andersson: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 25th percentileJoakim Andersson: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 12th percentileJoakim Andersson: Shot quality, 8.5% a shot, 79th percentileJoakim Andersson: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 42nd percentile
01232040Kevin Porter 3Joakim Andersson 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Porter
Joakim Andersson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Porter C, PIT 2015-16 Joakim Andersson C, DET
41 Games played 29
0 Goals 1
3 Assists 2
3 Points 3
0.07 Points per game 0.10
-2 Plus/minus 1
34 Shots 17
0.0 Shooting % 5.9
96 Hits 14
0 Penalty minutes 6
11:19 Average ice time 9:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.7 Corsi for % 48.5
-5.3 CF% relative to team -2.3
49.4 Fenwick for % 47.9
51.5 Expected goals for % 49.6
-6.1 xGF% relative to team +2.8
37.5 Goals for % 55.6
98.0 PDO 102.1
52 Shot attempts taken 28
Expected goals, all situations
3.7 Expected goals 2.1
0.48 Expected goals per 60 0.49
8.1% Chance per attempt 8.5%
-3.7 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
+0.9 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.0
-3.0 Even-strength offence -0.3
+1.4 Even-strength defence -0.3
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.5 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.7 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$575K Cap hit $815K
$192K Cap dollars per point $272K
$1.1M Worth at the going rate $622K
+$547K Value: worth minus cap hit -$193K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean