Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Torrey Mitchell Daniel Winnik

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTorrey Mitchell: Goals, 0.15 a game, 48th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Assists, 0.11 a game, 23rd percentileTorrey Mitchell: Points, 0.27 a game, 35th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shots, 0.97 a game, 15th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Hits, 0.94 a game, 40th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Corsi for %, 48.3%, 32nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: CF% rel, -3.7, 13th percentileTorrey Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 48th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Rating, -0.6 goals above replacement, 17th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 8th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 63rd percentileTorrey Mitchell: Finishing, +4.2 goals above expected, 85th percentileDaniel Winnik: Goals, 0.08 a game, 19th percentileDaniel Winnik: Assists, 0.17 a game, 39th percentileDaniel Winnik: Points, 0.25 a game, 29th percentileDaniel Winnik: Shots, 1.33 a game, 34th percentileDaniel Winnik: Hits, 0.70 a game, 28th percentileDaniel Winnik: Corsi for %, 50.5%, 53rd percentileDaniel Winnik: CF% rel, -2.1, 24th percentileDaniel Winnik: On-ice xG %, 51.6%, 63rd percentileDaniel Winnik: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 49th percentileDaniel Winnik: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 9th percentileDaniel Winnik: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 10th percentileDaniel Winnik: Finishing, -1.9 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
051015204060Torrey Mitchell 19Daniel Winnik 19

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Torrey Mitchell
Daniel Winnik

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Torrey Mitchell C, LAK 2015-16 Daniel Winnik L, MIN
71 Games played 76
11 Goals 6
8 Assists 13
19 Points 19
0.27 Points per game 0.25
2 Plus/minus 4
69 Shots 101
15.9 Shooting % 5.9
67 Hits 53
51 Penalty minutes 38
12:41 Average ice time 13:43
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.3 Corsi for % 50.5
-3.7 CF% relative to team -2.1
48.8 Fenwick for % 49.4
49.8 Expected goals for % 51.6
-1.6 xGF% relative to team -1.3
47.6 Goals for % 51.0
99.0 PDO 100.3
93 Shot attempts taken 158
Expected goals, all situations
6.8 Expected goals 7.9
0.45 Expected goals per 60 0.45
7.9% Chance per attempt 6.0%
+4.2 Goals above expected -1.9
Rating, in goals
-0.6 Goals above replacement +2.5
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.4
-2.8 Even-strength offence -2.6
+1.6 Even-strength defence +2.1
-0.1 Power play -0.2
-0.9 Penalty kill +0.6
-1.0 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$1.2M Cap hit $2.25M
$63K Cap dollars per point $118K
$178K Worth at the going rate $2.1M
-$1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$113K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean