Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Torrey Mitchell Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTorrey Mitchell: Goals, 0.10 a game, 27th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Assists, 0.12 a game, 22nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: Points, 0.22 a game, 22nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shots, 0.87 a game, 9th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Hits, 0.60 a game, 24th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Corsi for %, 48.3%, 32nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: CF% rel, -4.9, 9th percentileTorrey Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 52.2%, 66th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Rating, +4.5 goals above replacement, 64th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 9th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 69th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 43rd percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.09 a game, 20th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.12 a game, 24th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.21 a game, 20th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.54 a game, 45th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.83 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.3%, 73rd percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -3.4, 15th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 54.1%, 82nd percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +5.0 goals above replacement, 68th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 58th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -6.4 goals above expected, 5th percentile
05101520406080Torrey Mitchell 17Riley Nash 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Torrey Mitchell
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Torrey Mitchell C, LAK 2016-17 Riley Nash C, NYR
78 Games played 81
8 Goals 7
9 Assists 10
17 Points 17
0.22 Points per game 0.21
5 Plus/minus -1
68 Shots 125
11.8 Shooting % 5.6
47 Hits 67
38 Penalty minutes 14
12:36 Average ice time 13:48
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.3 Corsi for % 52.3
-4.9 CF% relative to team -3.4
50.1 Fenwick for % 53.0
52.2 Expected goals for % 54.1
-0.7 xGF% relative to team -1.7
52.2 Goals for % 40.9
100.7 PDO 97.3
112 Shot attempts taken 194
Expected goals, all situations
8.0 Expected goals 13.4
0.49 Expected goals per 60 0.72
8.2% Chance per attempt 7.9%
-1.0 Goals above expected -6.4
Rating, in goals
+4.5 Goals above replacement +5.0
+0.7 Wins above replacement +0.8
-2.9 Even-strength offence -3.3
+4.0 Even-strength defence +3.6
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.4 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.4 Penalties +1.6
Contract
$1.2M Cap hit $900K
$71K Cap dollars per point $53K
$3.4M Worth at the going rate $3.8M
+$2.2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean