Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Torrey Mitchell Marcus Kruger

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTorrey Mitchell: Goals, 0.10 a game, 27th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Assists, 0.12 a game, 22nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: Points, 0.22 a game, 22nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shots, 0.87 a game, 9th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Hits, 0.60 a game, 24th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Corsi for %, 48.3%, 32nd percentileTorrey Mitchell: CF% rel, -4.9, 9th percentileTorrey Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 52.2%, 66th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Rating, +4.5 goals above replacement, 64th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 9th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 69th percentileTorrey Mitchell: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 43rd percentileMarcus Kruger: Goals, 0.07 a game, 14th percentileMarcus Kruger: Assists, 0.17 a game, 37th percentileMarcus Kruger: Points, 0.24 a game, 26th percentileMarcus Kruger: Shots, 1.19 a game, 25th percentileMarcus Kruger: Hits, 0.44 a game, 14th percentileMarcus Kruger: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 57th percentileMarcus Kruger: CF% rel, 0.4, 51st percentileMarcus Kruger: On-ice xG %, 53.9%, 80th percentileMarcus Kruger: Rating, +3.2 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileMarcus Kruger: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 6th percentileMarcus Kruger: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 32nd percentileMarcus Kruger: Finishing, -3.2 goals above expected, 18th percentile
051015204060Torrey Mitchell 17Marcus Kruger 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Torrey Mitchell
Marcus Kruger

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Torrey Mitchell C, LAK 2016-17 Marcus Kruger C, CHI
78 Games played 70
8 Goals 5
9 Assists 12
17 Points 17
0.22 Points per game 0.24
5 Plus/minus 7
68 Shots 83
11.8 Shooting % 6.0
47 Hits 31
38 Penalty minutes 34
12:36 Average ice time 14:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.3 Corsi for % 50.7
-4.9 CF% relative to team +0.4
50.1 Fenwick for % 53.5
52.2 Expected goals for % 53.9
-0.7 xGF% relative to team +6.0
52.2 Goals for % 56.6
100.7 PDO 100.4
112 Shot attempts taken 105
Expected goals, all situations
8.0 Expected goals 7.2
0.49 Expected goals per 60 0.44
8.2% Chance per attempt 7.1%
-1.0 Goals above expected -3.2
Rating, in goals
+4.5 Goals above replacement +3.2
+0.7 Wins above replacement +0.5
-2.9 Even-strength offence -2.0
+4.0 Even-strength defence +4.5
-0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.4 Penalty kill -0.5
+0.4 Penalties -1.4
Contract
$1.2M Cap hit $3.083M
$71K Cap dollars per point $181K
$3.4M Worth at the going rate $2.6M
+$2.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$502K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean